 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
Merge it - Astrid Sanchez 190.28.81.140 15:53, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
This is a very amateurish article which tells us more about the level of knowledge of the article writer than about schematic capture.
There is almost no information about the theory of schematic design. The author seems to believe that schematic capture is mainly used in board level design, which is not the case.
The links are completely useless as they point to a hodgepodge of tools and projects that are unrepresentative of the state of the art of schematic capture and are either from the amateur electronics sector or advertising for fringe products. Aside from the fact that links to commercial products are probably not the most important encyclopedic information, if they are given, they should represent the most often used products, not the few products the author of this article seems to know about or like (for whatever reason). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.6.255.162 (talk) 06:54, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the edit this page link at the top.
The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). --DavidCary (talk) 05:02, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
