This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
A fact from Serious Sam Double D appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 August 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
"Enemies can appear" > "Enemies appear" Best to use an active voice. The next "can" is fine because unlike the enemies, it's about player input.
Mastertronic is mentioned in the body, but not the lead or infobox.
Gameplay
"Enemies may approach" > "Enemies approach"
Development and release
It would be good to mention other games in the Indie Series (same applies to the previous GA we worked on)
Reception
Should try to be consistent with how you're citing critics; at times you call it "company's writer," "writer of company," and "writer (company)"
Images
Once again, try to make the rationale a bit more specific to the screenshot
Cut down the list of weapons in the screenshot caption to "multiple weapons in a stack"
Cut down the lead image to "Cover art of Serious Sam Double D"
References
From my understanding, Gaming Age is a situationally reliable source, and the project requires that the author be demonstrated as trustworthy.
One important thing to note is that a lot of Engadget's sources are actually Joystiq. I'm not sure how it is generally handled when articles from one website are migrated to another though.
Thank you once more, Abryn, for the review. I have performed some copyediting that should suit your requested changes. Note that I removed the infobox image caption completely because just "Cover art of Serious Sam Double D" is evident in itself and does not necessitate an explicit mention.
Using Engadget in place of Joystiq has not caused any issues in the past, as far as I know. Engadget did have its own (minor) gaming section before and it's not always clear what of the current content was formerly on Joystiq. To avoid original research, just using Engadget should do.
As for Gaming Age, the discussions linked from WP:VG/RS#Other situational are not very conclusive. I don't think using a review is too controversial but, depending on your preferences, we could remove it entirely (wouldn't be much of a loss) or put it before the VG project again.