Talk:Small unit tactics

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Technology This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force

work in progress

will flesh out the squad section and add a platoon section as time permits. Please fill free to contribute, especially if your come from from a country that does things differently.

Azr@el 06:57, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, firstly which country doctrine is this section currently been written from? (Just wondering about the RPG element, which would be replaced by a NLAW or ALAW element) Perhaps a section on the development of small unit tactics as there are distinctly different styles through out the history of gunpowder light infantry.

--Khorne25 (talk) 19:08, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What is this "jam" section about? I can't even follow it since it doesn't describe how it relates to, well, anything. 72.200.151.13 (talk) 08:50, 21 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]