&sq=Qlik&lang=&file=File:Clipboard.svg){kind=small} | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 April 2008. The result of the discussion was keep. |
&sq=Qlik&lang=&file=File:Symbol_start_class.svg){kind=small} | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
&sq=Qlik&lang=&file=File:Four_colors_of_pills.jpg){kind=small}
&sq=Qlik&lang=&file=File:Cannabis_leaf_2.svg){kind=small}
&sq=Qlik&lang=&file=File:Cannabis_leaf.svg){kind=small}
removed the commando knife rip howto section, was inappropriate in spotting world wide and pretty howto generally, commando or spotless knife hits could certainly be worked into the article elsewhere though Dirtyfilthy (talk) 09:17, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
"how-to" sections have been fixed, but we still need more pop culture refs. i've been told there was/is a prominent stencil-graffiti mural in queenstown that says something along the lines of "save power this winter, turn the knives off", a picture of this would be awesome ;) Ars666 (talk) 19:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Page needs BIG cleanup.
If anyone can help with structuring the article and removing the 'how-to' feel that it has currently WITHOUT deleting content please feel free.
There is also more information that needs to be on here.
References are good. It helps keep those overzealous deletionist nazis at bay.
--
"A practice that should only done by master knife hitters, taking commando knife rips is a very dangerous method of smoking marijuana and should only be attempted after years taking knife rips in general." <--- HAHAHAHAHAHA
wtf happen to this page?
this article used to have much more information and now its been reduced to a stub again!
how come this page was only created in january 08? it has been around much longer than that - this smacks of revisionist bullshit
What is going on in Wikipedia land? My friends and I made a serious effort to create the defintive article on 'spots' and it has been replaced by a paragraph from some hack that does not deserve to be a footnote to the original article. The ability of 'experts' to substitute informative expositions on a particular subject for brief and vacuous coverage is a detriment to Wikipedia as a whole. I'm sure that those who read the original article would agree. Why was it changed/massacred? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vpkiwi (talk • contribs) 06:41, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
I totaly agree. The old enrty was just right and even had a good photo. The current entry should go.
- The previous article was nominated for deletion, and the final consensus was to merge it with Cannabis smoking#Knife Hits. Please view the discussion HERE. I will, once again, nominate it for deletion. If you have anything to contribute, please contribute it to Cannabis smoking. ~ Wakanda's Black Panther! (contribs) 07:05, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
the knife hits entry doesnt even exist anymore! spotting is a widespread methods for smoking cannabis. i see that joints and bongs have their own page, whats the deal here, huh? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.233.190 (talk) 04:56, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Please read carefully wikipedia policies about adding new content: wikipedia:Attribution. Text without references may be deleted at any time. `'Míkka>t 15:43, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Mikka please read WP:GAME
No *new* content was added. Some of the the bias and 'how-to' were removed. This is actually an improvement over the previous page. References will come as page develops, how is it supposed to improve if people like you keep deleting the little content this article has?! It seems as though people are all too happy to totally trash other people's articles based on spurious reasons. Heres an idea: How about instead of deleting 95% of the article (including references), you IMPROVE it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.234.233.190 (talk) 19:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)