Talk:Streets of Rage Remake

Streets of Rage Remake has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
February 27, 2024	Good article nominee	Not listed
May 2, 2024	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 August 2006. The result of the discussion was delete.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Atelier Double (1 participant)
IGN Convention (3 participants)
Vector Unit (3 participants)
Darkworks (5 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Streets of Rage Remake/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vrxces (talk · contribs) 04:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for bringing life to this well-written article that you have clearly put some good work into. I think this is unfortunately a WP:QF on the basis that it is a long way from satisfying breadth of coverage of the topic. This is mostly because the article largely lacks what I would consider sufficient sourcing.

The available sources have WP:SIGCOV and commentary about the circumstances of the creation and shutdown of the game, such as the Kotaku and Wired sources. What the article lacks is evidence of reception from reliable sourcing such as WP:VG/S usual for WP:VG/MOS. Currently, the Sydney Morning Herald is the only source that evidences an independent opinion about the game. Given that [7] is trivial coverage, this is a very limited evidence base for an article, most sources of which did not play the game and are only talking about its surrounding circumstances and what the release information states. This makes it what could theoretically be a sound candidate for a WP:MERGE with the overarching series, although I do not propose to do this.

I understand this may be disappointing but remember that this process can only improve articles, and encourage you to see if there is sourcing out there to build up this article. You may like to check out the Internet Archive and the WP:VG/SE as different approaches if you have not done so already, although the conflation with Streets of Rage may make this a little tricky. Remember that the GAN process has no fetters and you can resubmit a GAN at any time. ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 04:14, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]