Talk:Suburban Legends (song)

Good articleSuburban Legends (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSuburban Legends (song) is part of the 1989 (Taylor's Version) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 27, 2024Good article nomineeListed
August 23, 2024Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Suburban Legends (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Gained (talk · contribs) 14:36, 29 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Dora the Axe-plorer (talk · contribs) 15:54, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Prose

[edit]

"The re-recordings featured tracks from the sessions she had eschewed from their originals" this reads weird, do you simply mean "original sessions"?

Verifiability

[edit]

In-line citations, good, appropriate templates used. Fifteen spot checks done, they are all fine with the exception of the re-recording claim. As of publication of Jem Aswad's Variety piece, we aren't certain Swift actually began re-recording albums 1–5 in November 2020. It seems to be an announcement she could do that rather than what the article currently implies.

Excellent work! I only have two items to nitpick so far. Please clarify these concerns and so I can hopefully pass the nomination. Cheers Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 11:55, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing this, @Dora the Axe-plorer! I'll address your points sometime this week. Gained (talk) 08:14, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, @Dora the Axe-plorer! I have addressed the points you made. Gained (talk) 10:13, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Gained, thanks for addressing the points. I will go ahead and pass this nomination. Cheers! Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 00:00, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]