Talk:Switchflicker Records

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Record Labels This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

this is the page i have created for my record label, switchflicker records—Preceding unsigned comment added by Switchflicker (talk • contribs)

Please have a read of WP:COI and WP:SPAM: you need to be very careful when writing about something on Wikipedia that you're directly involved with, in order to maintain neutrality. Thanks, MuffledThud (talk) 12:31, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MT, I'm not sure you should have removed all the tags even for a stub, COI, advert POV etc. FWIW. Nerdseeksblonde (talk) 12:33, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Which of the former tags do you believe should remain, following the complete re-write? MuffledThud (talk) 13:17, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The notability tag is there, and sources may or may not be sufficient as I'm not familiar with the domains. Nerdseeksblonde (talk) 13:26, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed db-copyvio, csb-pageincludes and db-spam, as part of a complete rewrite[1]: which tags should not have been removed? MuffledThud (talk) 13:41, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Those are ok now AFAIK, I think last I looked it had no tags or refernces. Nerdseeksblonde (talk) 13:45, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]