Talk:Sydsvenskan

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Newspapers Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Sweden Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

I'm sorry, I'm taking out the sentence "For foreign readers this newspaper is peculiar inasmuch as minor deviations from Stockholm/Gothenburg based newspapers in regard to Swedish language grammar, orthography and vocabulary seem consistently enforced" The combination of "deviations" with "enforced" doesn't make sense. I also don't understand why anything to do with Swedish grammar, orthography and vocabulary is supposed to be interesting especially to foreign readers. If you wrote the sentence, or understand these things, please clarify and re-insert! --Bishonen 19:12, 5 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Sydsvenskan's online edition itself excludes these two sentences: "Their main objective is to write negative news about Malmö and open up the articles for comments and blogs from anti-Malmö right-wingers. The online newspaper is also openly endorsing a pro-Nazi blog, named 'Som jag ser det'". It's untrue. --Sydsvenskan.se 17.20, 5 Jul 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.235.142.98 (talk) 17:14, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for removing it, this opinionated slander very obviously did not follow the WP:NPOV policy. Tomas e (talk) 21:48, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]