Talk:Technology brokering

The title is misspelled - broking should be brokering. This can't be edited when I login. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:9:4B80:493:DDEC:14DE:2AEE:E0CB (talk) 08:06, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In the section:

Technology Brokering: Example Products

The reference to Crave Aid Patch as an example TB derived from the nicotine patch is a false comparison and should be removed. The Crave Aid Patch is a sticker with a diagram of food on it (placebo), the nicotine patch uses chemical and materials technologies to ameliorate withdrawal symptoms- these are not comparable.

Αγαθος και Σωφος, Σωφος και Καλος, Καλος και Αγαθος (talk) 21:22, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is a better way to describe and formulate technology brokering with this link https://www.iclassed.com/p/technical-broker.html. The current context is too broad that it become superficial to technology realities as some technology transfer documents and initiatives. 61.9.103.21 (talk) 04:44, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]