Talk:Vibe (Tove Styrke song)

	Vibe (Tove Styrke song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 17, 2023 Good article nominee Listed

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pop music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Songs This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles Sweden Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women in Music This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Vibe (Tove Styrke song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 07:51, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

This article can be reviewed in one day! --K. Peake 07:51, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Why is electronic not listed next to pop in genres under the infobox?
• Add a comma after third studio album
• The songwriting and production sentence should be the second of the first para instead
• "five months after the album's original release." → "five months after the original release."
• "issued "Vibe" as" → "issued it as"
• "Musically, "Vibe" is an" → "It is an"
• "contrary to other Sway tracks" → "contrary to the album's other tracks"
• ""Vibe" was met with generally positive reviews" → ""Vibe" received generally positive reviews" and add what they praised about it

Done the first part, but I don't really know how to summarize the reviews. Do you see a common thread in the reviews? Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• "the single appeared below" → "the song appeared below"
• "peaking at number ten" → "peaking at number 10" per MOS:NUM
• Remove pipe on Heatseeker
• "of the United Kingdom and Nordic legs" → "of the British and Nordic legs" for consistency with the way you refer to these areas

I believe all of these have been addressed. Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• "Soon after the release" → "Shortly after the release"

Done.

• "she had been working" → "Styrke had been working"

Done.

• The source does not say it was only added to digital editions

Well it says it was added. A song can't be added to physical editions without the album being re-released, which it never was. The only versions of the album were issued before this song. I don't know how to cite the fact that it isn't on physical editions. Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Audio sample looks good!
• Pipe chorus to Refrain
• Since the guitar-heavy sentence essentially uses part of the same quote, why don't you paraphrase the second part to something like she had wanted to create a guitar-based song for a while?
• Remove the comma after percussion
• "She elaborated, "It's" → "Styrke elaborated that "it's"
• "a bit sadder."" → "a bit sadder"." per MOS:QUOTE (this is not a full sentence in the source)'

All done! Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• "Styrke told MyLondon that" → "Styrke told MyLondon,"
• "In December 2018, she performed" → "In December 2018, Styrke performed"
• ""Vibe" received general praise from" → ""Vibe" was met with general praise from"
• "song showcased Styrke's" → "song showcases Styrke's"
• Remove the introduction to Bands of Tomorrow
• Add a space about December 2018's comma
• "was critical of it in" → "was critical of the performance in"
• Mention that "On the Low" and "Sway" were 2018 singles
• "peaked at number ten" → "peaked at number 10" per MOS:NUM

Done and done! Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Good

• Good

• Format → Format(s)

Done.

• There are not various citations to back up digital download and streaming

Source says "Also available in the iTunes Store". Should I include an additional source? Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Copyvio score looks decent at 39%
• Cite BroadwayWorld as publisher instead on ref 7
• Add url-access limited to ref 18
• What exactly makes ref 20 a reliable source?

From what I can tell it's a well-known music magazine in Denmark. I have found their reviews cited in articles by DR and JydskeVestkysten, [1][2]. I'm not Danish myself but it seems reliable. Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Add url-access subscription to ref 22
• Wikilink Sverigetopplistan on ref 26 instead of ref 27

Done! Pancake (talk) 19:21, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

•  On hold until all of the issues are fixed; nice work here! --K. Peake 09:14, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review! Appreciate it :) Pancake (talk) 19:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• PancakeMistake Thanks for going over this, however change electronic and pop to two separate genres in the infobox, add at least a vague part like "some of whom" after music critics to summarize something that was praised by at least a few and add citations from various countries retailers for digital download and streaming. --K. Peake 09:31, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Kyle Peake Tried to summarize the reviews, let me know what you think. Genre and various retailers, done. Pancake (talk) 17:58, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• ✓ Pass now, I briefly copyedited but nice job! --K. Peake 20:17, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]