Talk:Yunnan hare

Yunnan hare has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 8, 2017. (Reviewed version).

A fact from Yunnan hare appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 September 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the Yunnan hare was formerly considered a subspecies of the woolly hare but is now treated as a separate species? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2017/September. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Yunnan hare.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mammals Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. China Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Yunnan hare/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dunkleosteus77 (talk · contribs) 22:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Instead of, "The Yunnan hare (Lepus comus) is a medium-sized species of mammal in the family Leporidae, the same family as rabbits and hares," how about, "The Yunnan hare (Lepus comus) is a medium-sized species of rabbit in the family Leporidae" ?   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Adityavagarwal (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• "It is a herbivore" it is an herbivore   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Adityavagarwal (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• what are "forbes"?   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Herbaceous plant, linked. Adityavagarwal (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Expand IUCN on first mention

Done. Adityavagarwal (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• "The Chinese regional Red Listing has red listed the Yunnan hare as a near threatened species" it's just "listed" not "red listed", and it's called "The Red List of China's Vertebrates", and you could say "as near threatened" instead of "a near threatened species"   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Adityavagarwal (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• "According to no Hoffmann and Smith"   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Woops! Fixed. Adityavagarwal (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• who are "Mammals of China"? Also in the list, you only need to have the ref after the colon   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Linked and ref fixed! Adityavagarwal (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• use this converter to convert ISBN-10 to ISBN-13 as per WP:ISBN   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done! (Should have done it earlier :P) Adityavagarwal (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• "indicated the Yunnan hare and the woolly hare to be a sister taxa..." a sister taxa of what?   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Both were sister taxa. Removed "a", hope it is clear now? Adityavagarwal (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• "... and possibly be its northern form" does that mean that some people think it's actually a phenotype of L. nigricollis?   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is uncertain, but the possibility is there. Changed word to probable. Adityavagarwal (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• you don't need to wikilink "tail"   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unlinked. Adityavagarwal (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• "Its back of the hip" you may want to use hyphens here   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Used. Adityavagarwal (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• You forgot to italicize the binomial name in ref no. 5   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Woops! Fixed. Adityavagarwal (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• "...and the toothrow diastema (space between two teeth) proportions" this looks like a fragment to me   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I din't understand. :P Adityavagarwal (talk) 23:51, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• "Although very less data about its habitat is available..." how about, "Although not much is known about its habitat..."?

Tweaked. Adityavagarwal (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• "elevations of 1,300 to 3,200 m (4,300 to 10,500 ft) from sea level" change "from" to "above"   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Adityavagarwal (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• "adult Yunnan hare has three burrows, and those of the male being shallower" to "adult Yunnan hare have three burrows; those of the male are shallower..."   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:41, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Adityavagarwal (talk) 23:49, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Dunkleosteus77: Thanks a lot for your awesome review! Adityavagarwal (talk) 02:54, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]