Talk:Zari (song)

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Zari (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Nascar9919 (talk · contribs) 04:57, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 17:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    c. (OR):
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

I'll get on with this today! --K. Peake 17:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Ref is not needed when the songwriters are sourced in the prose
  • Replace hlist with bullet points per Template:Infobox song
  • WP:OVERLINK of Marina Satti under composers
  • Mention in the opening sentence it is from her her debut extended play, P.O.P. (2024)
  • "It was co-written by" → "The song was co-written by" and shouldn't you mention how many producers there was too?
  • "and released on" → "It was released on" as a new sentence and change to simply reading "from the EP" as this should have already been introduced earlier on
  • "It represented Greece" → "The song represented Greece" since you use "it" later in the sentence anyway
  • Add a sentence at the end of the first paragraph mentioning how the song was created from selecting a few snippets from the 200 submissions
  • "to tell the "real characteristics"" – the quote is not sourced at all, so re-word to something like "to against the stereotypes" per the body
  • "The song was met with a" → "The song received a"
  • "it peaked within the top ten" → "the song peaked within the top 10" per MOS:NUM

Background and composition

[edit]
  • Add a second sentence sourcing the producers because there are the infobox but not written out at all in the body as they should be
  • The quote has too much overlap with the usage of felt in prose; cut down to "because she "felt readier now"." per MOS:QUOTE
  • Wiwibloggs should not be italicised
  • "with the die" → "with the refrain"

Music video

[edit]
  • "an accompanying music video was" → "a music video was" with the wikilink
  • "an Australian tourist[14] while" → "an Australian tourist,[14] while"
  • "with the tourist presented in the video representing" → "with the tourist presented representing"
  • "stating that "my dream" → "expressing "my dream"
  • I do not think Overthinking It is a reliable source – appears this is a fiction podcast from their website

Critical reception

[edit]

Greek media and personalities

[edit]
  • I think the first quote can be re-worded after the "didn't send a song" part to mention something like how it lacked clear rhythms and a trap genre or any other genre
  • Put Dimitris Rigopoulos' quote into your own words from "something that they seem" onwards
  • Not sure about Matt Wrather usage since he is from Overthinking It
[edit]
  • Wiwibloggs should not be italicised or linked
  • "rated the song tenth out" → "rated the song 10th out" per MOS:NUM, although this is the 11th place unless I'm missing something here?
  • "this year" but also" → "this year", but also"
  • "in some cases."" → "in some cases"." per MOS:QUOTE
  • Second para soon!