The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to pseudoscience and fringe science, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
Arbitration Ruling on the Treatment of Pseudoscience In December of 2006 the Arbitration Committee ruled on guidelines for the presentation of topics as pseudoscience in Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Pseudoscience. The final decision was as follows:
|
This is the template sandbox page for Template:ArbCom Pseudoscience (diff). |
{{ArbCom Pseudoscience}}
This template should be used on the talk pages of pages relating to pseudoscience and fringe science, broadly interpreted.
Non-administrators should be cautious when placing this notice on pages which are not clearly related to the topic area.
To add only the elements of the decision, and not the Ds notice, use {{Arbitration ruling on pseudoscience}}
.
This section transcluded from: Template:Contentious topics/list/single notice [edit] [Contentious topics template subpages]
Alerting
Enforcement
Whenever contentious topics are (de)authorised for a topic, update these: {{Contentious topics/list}} (edit), WP:GS §3.1 (edit), and {{Contentious topics/table}} (edit).