- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 20:12, 26 April 2020 (UTC)
432 Park Avenue
432 Park Avenue
Improved to Good Article status by Epicgenius (talk) and Wontonalertbulb (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 16:07, 2 April 2020 (UTC).
- While i thought it was a joke, that original hook seems completely true, even with quotes from the architect. This review is for that first hook.
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
|
|
QPQ: - qpq still needed
Overall: just needs a qpq Found5dollar (talk) 21:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Found5dollar: Thanks for the review. I have done a QPQ. Yes, the hook is real, but if only I'd gotten this passed as a GA a week earlier... epicgenius (talk) 02:17, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- QPQ completed, this is good to go!Found5dollar (talk) 16:28, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: striking ALT1 and ALT2, since they have not been reviewed, while leaving the original hook, which was. BlueMoonset (talk) 22:55, 18 April 2020 (UTC)