- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 21:43, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Akshata Murty
Akshata Murty
Improved to Good Article status by CT55555 (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 23:55, 19 December 2022 (UTC).
General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
Hook eligibility:
Overall: @Onegreatjoke: Everything seems okay except for the hook. It doesn't seem particularly interesting or captivating. Could you come up with a few others instead? Unlimitedlead (talk) 23:43, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Unlimitedlead: How about alt1 "... that Akshata Murty was richer than Queen Elizabeth II?" Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:56, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Sounds great, but there would need to be a citation for that, and I think it should be in the article as well. Please let me know when both have been done. Thanks, Unlimitedlead (talk) 02:05, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Unlimitedlead: I've placed it in the article with a citation in the career and investments section. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:13, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Great. Approving this nomination. Unlimitedlead (talk) 16:14, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Unlimitedlead and Onegreatjoke: I'd like to see a bit more context in the hook, and possibly use a living example to avoid the awkward use of "was". How about:
- I've also added an image. Thanks! theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/her) 09:46, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Theleekycauldron: @Onegreatjoke: Looks fine to me. Unlimitedlead (talk) 14:22, 30 December 2022 (UTC)