- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:26, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Allied logistics in the Southern France campaign
![The Aix bridge, repaired with the carriage of a German railway gun](//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/02/The_Aix_bridge%2C_repaired_with_the_carriage_of_a_German_railway_gun.png/169px-The_Aix_bridge%2C_repaired_with_the_carriage_of_a_German_railway_gun.png)
The Aix bridge, repaired with the carriage of a German railway gun
- ... that in support of Allied logistics in the Southern France campaign, engineers repaired a bridge using the carriage of a German railway gun? Source: "The 343d Engineer General Service Regiment restored service to Aix in ten days by a strategem that saved days in repairing a 104-foot gap in the rail bridge. In the area the unit found a German 270-mm. railway gun. Hauling it to the site, the engineers stripped the gun and the rail trucks from the traverse base of the piece and, attaching a ten-foot steel extension, launched the platform as the stringers for the new span across the void, Bailey fashion. The Aix bridge work was complete on 29 August." ([1], p 451)
- ALT1:... that ...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
Created by Hawkeye7 (talk). Self-nominated at 01:05, 10 February 2021 (UTC).
Hi Hawkeye7, review follows: article moved to mainspace 9 February; article certainly exceeds minimum length! Article is well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; I don't have access to all of the sources but I checked a random sample and found no issues with overly close paraphrasing; hook is interesting, mentioned in the article and backed up by the source stated; image is used in the article, is relevant, works well at small scale and is correctly licensed as PD; a QPQ has been carried out. I really like this hook and photo (though speaking as a civil engineer it looks absolutely terrifying!) - Dumelow (talk) 08:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)