The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Lightbursttalk 14:07, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Overall: QPQ not required Hawkeye7(discuss) 21:42, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
@Hawkeye7 and PrimalMustelid:WP:DYKCRITThe hook fact should be cited in the article, no later than the end of the sentence it appears in. I can promote after this is done. Lightburst (talk) 16:16, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
@Lightburst: Sorry, I'm having trouble understanding. I cited in the limbs paragraph, "Unlike Anoplotherium where one species (A. commune) is didactyl (two-toed) as opposed to all other species which are tridactyl (three-toed), all species of Diplobune are tridactyl." Do you want me to mention artiodactyls as a whole in that sentence? PrimalMustelid (talk) 17:01, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
@Lightburst: Pinging again in case you hadn't seen my previous comment. PrimalMustelid (talk) 12:14, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for the ping and sorry for the hold up. I see it now, the word use was different than our hook but it says Unlike typical "even-toed" artiodactyls and Anoplotherium where one species (A. commune) is didactyl (two-toed) as opposed to all other species which are tridactyl (three-toed), all species of Diplobune are tridactyl.[29]Lightburst (talk) 14:06, 3 October 2023 (UTC)