The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Improved to Good Article status by CT55555 (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 03:13, 11 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Kerr-Addison Mine; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
---|
|
QPQ: Done. |
Overall: As Cxbrx has pointed out, the source given here does not fully support ALT0 since it does not specify a year. However, the source cited in the article itself is [1] and supports this claim (The best single year for Kerr Addison was in 1960, with production of 18,400 kg Au (see Figure 2) from 1,512,860 tonnes of ore milled, making it the top Au mine in North America for that year.
).
ALT1 is problematic since it does not mention any year. So the general claim that "Kerr-Addison Mine produced the second most gold overall in North America" is not supported.
The sentence in our article about the gold production in 1960 sounds like a WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE. To be on the safe side, it may be better to reformulate it some more. Phlsph7 (talk) 11:51, 20 June 2023 (UTC)
The most successful year was 1960 in which 18,400 kilograms of gold were produced from 1,512,860 tons of ore, making the mine the top producer in North America." in our article to avoid WP:CLOSEPARAPHRASE. Otherwise, I think it's a go. Phlsph7 (talk) 18:01, 20 June 2023 (UTC)