- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 22:40, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Lunch Atop a Skyscraper
Lunch atop a Skyscraper, 1932
- ... that the "most famous picture of a lunch break in New York history" (pictured) was actually a publicity stunt? Source: [1], [2],
Improved to Good Article status by Kavyansh.Singh (talk). Self-nominated at 12:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
AGF source for hook per nom valereee (talk) 18:24, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Hey, Kavyansh.Singh! I can't get to the Telegraph, and the NYP isn't really a great source. You're satisfied this hook is supported by the Telegraph article? valereee (talk) 18:41, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Hey @Valereee, great to see you back! The Telegraph is used to cite the publicity stunt part. It says: "Lunch Atop a Skyscraper, taken in New York on 20 September 1932, celebrates its 80th anniversary - but archivists say it was a publicity stunt." [3]. As for NYP, yeah, it isn't a great source but it is used only as a primary source in the article, and here for the quotation. It says: "It’s probably the most famous picture of a lunch break in New York history – and it seems hundreds of people know someone who was there." So it is more or less combination of those two sources. Does that work? – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 18:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, good to be working again. I'll AGF that the source supports the hook, especially since it's a GA and you're an experienced DYK regular. Should the article be moved to Lunch atop a Skyscraper? I feel like headline case wouldn't capitalize 'atop'? To me it's like 'Lunch On a Skyscraper' to cap 'atop'. valereee (talk) 21:20, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. As for the article title, it was initially 'atop' when I started working, but I moved it to 'Atop' as it is a part of the title, and most of the WP:RS I say capitalizes that. Example: The New York Times, Time, The Telegraph, etc. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 04:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Valereee: If we're using title case, then the current title is indeed correct: Lunch Atop a Skyscraper. "Atop" is not lowercased, at least by several style guides, which do not lowercase prepositions that are four or more letters long; "a" is lowercase, though. If the title were Lunch on a Skyscraper, then yes, "on" would be lowercased. Just my two cents. Epicgenius (talk) 13:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Epicgenius, oh, very interesting! I did not know that four-or-more-letters thing! So many things to learn, thanks! valereee (talk) 18:27, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, good to be working again. I'll AGF that the source supports the hook, especially since it's a GA and you're an experienced DYK regular. Should the article be moved to Lunch atop a Skyscraper? I feel like headline case wouldn't capitalize 'atop'? To me it's like 'Lunch On a Skyscraper' to cap 'atop'. valereee (talk) 21:20, 15 May 2022 (UTC)