- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by BorgQueen (talk) 14:17, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Nabataean Aramaic
- ... that the very earliest Nabataean Aramaic inscriptions already contain Arabic names and loanwords? Source: From the period of its earliest attestation, Nabataean Aramaic is notable for the use of Arabic or Ancient North Arabian loanwords and grammar, reflecting strong contact with these languages. [1]
- Reviewed:
- Comment: The article refers to "Arabic or Ancient North Arabian", which is a matter of definition.
Improved to Good Article status by Benji man (talk). Self-nominated at 12:43, 13 February 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Nabataean Aramaic; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
- Would like different wording
| QPQ: None required. |
Overall: 
@Benji man: Good article. But the hook is confusingly worded in my opinion. Could you write it differently? Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:15, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, Onegreatjoke! How's this? Benji man (talk) 09:39, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
I think that's better. Onegreatjoke (talk) 20:10, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
