Template:Did you know nominations/Noken system

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Rjjiii talk 14:39, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Noken system

(

)

... that the noken system used for voting in parts of Indonesia produces turnouts of 100%? Source: It is then not surprising if in several districts the turnout rates reached 100 percent on the fnal tally results (page 80)
- ALT1: ... that the Constitutional Court of Indonesia approved of the noken system of voting, despite it having no legal basis? Source: the Noken system, which is not provided for by any state laws or regulations,..what is significant from this case is not the court's approval of a fresh round of elections, but rather its acceptance of local (Papua) customs and practices in local elections (ie the Noken system)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Veto (card game)
- Comment: Other hook ideas welcome!

Created by Chipmunkdavis (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 48 past nominations.

CMD (talk) 20:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: I was wondering when this would be an article! Great work on it. New enough, long enough, sourced, neutral, plagiarism free. Hooks are cited and interesting. QPQ is complete. Per your invitation, I would like to suggest the following hook for consideration:

ALT2: ... the Constitutional Court of Indonesia ruled that the noken system is a valid method of electoral choice, reflecting customary practices and decreasing conflict? Ornithoptera (talk) 01:42, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
May be worth changing the end to "stating that it reflects customary practices and decreases conflict?" to make it clear that this is the view of the court and not a wikivoice statement. CMD (talk) 04:10, 1 October 2024 (UTC)