- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:00, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Nucleon magnetic moment
- ... that the neutron, a subatomic particle, has no charge and yet has a magnetic moment? And that property indicates it is composed of quarks? Source: Vonsovsky, Sergei (1975). Magnetism of Elementary Particles. Moscow: Mir Publishers. Pages 73-74, 188https://archive.org/details/MagnetismOfElementaryParticles/page/n189/mode/2up?view=theater
- Reviewed:
Created by Bdushaw (talk). Self-nominated at 00:16, 17 December 2022 (UTC).
Reviewing... Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:13, 17 December 2022 (UTC)- @Bdushaw: Everything is good. However, your one hook has two hooks in it which isn't allowed. Either you find a way to connect the two or you get rid of the second hook. Also I linked neutron in the hook to better understand it. Onegreatjoke (talk) 15:13, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- How about: "... that the neutron, a subatomic particle composed of quarks, has no electric charge and yet it has a magnetic moment?" Personally, I am fascinated by the fact that the magnetic moment was a red flag that the neutron was composite, but perhaps that's a bit much for an average reader. Bdushaw (talk) 16:34, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
yeah that's fine. Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:18, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
