- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 22:09, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Reichsoberhandelsgericht
- ... that for more than six decades no federal supreme court existed in the German territories until the Reichsoberhandelsgericht was formed in 1869? Source: With the disintegration of the Holy Roman Empire in 1806 the judicial activities of the two German supreme courts – the Reichskammergericht in Wetzlar and the Aulic Council (the Reichshofrat) in Vienna – also came to an end. For more than six decades no federal supreme court existed in the German territories until the Reichskammergericht was formed in 1869. Fleckner, Andreas M. (2009). "Reichsoberhandelsgericht (mit Reichsgericht)". Handwörterbuch des Europäischen Privatrechts (in German). Archived from the original on 2 March 2021. Retrieved 10 October 2020.
Created by WatkynBassett (talk). Self-nominated at 11:28, 15 October 2021 (UTC).
- New enough, long enough, neutral, well cited, does not appear to have been plagiarised. Very interesting piece of German legal history that I wasn't aware of. Hook fact is neutral and cited in the article. I have fixed a typo in the nomination (1879->1869, please double check WatkynBassett) and used {{lang}} per WP:DYKSG. As you are exempt from the quid pro quo requirement, this is good to go.
—Kusma (talk) 20:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Many thanks for your very quick review, Kusma, and your interest in this topic. You are of course right in correcting the date in the hook. As a relatively recent contributor I was not aware of the template {{lang}} and will gladly use it in the future. Is there anything else I need to do for this nomination to succeed?WatkynBassett (talk) 07:58, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- @WatkynBassett: Currently you just have to wait. After a week or three, someone will process it further, which happens at subpages of Template:Did you know/Queue: first, a "prep builder" will add it to one of the "prep sets", then a few days or a week later it will be moved into the "queue", from where a bot will add it to the Main Page according to schedule. Usually the prep builder will make a note here (at least in their edit summary) when they close this nomination so you can see where your nomination is and check whether anyone has made it worse. Or better :) But unless something unexpected happens, you can just wait until a bot will notify you when this gets posted on the Main Page. —Kusma (talk) 09:29, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Many thanks for your very quick review, Kusma, and your interest in this topic. You are of course right in correcting the date in the hook. As a relatively recent contributor I was not aware of the template {{lang}} and will gladly use it in the future. Is there anything else I need to do for this nomination to succeed?WatkynBassett (talk) 07:58, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- New enough, long enough, neutral, well cited, does not appear to have been plagiarised. Very interesting piece of German legal history that I wasn't aware of. Hook fact is neutral and cited in the article. I have fixed a typo in the nomination (1879->1869, please double check WatkynBassett) and used {{lang}} per WP:DYKSG. As you are exempt from the quid pro quo requirement, this is good to go.
