Template:Did you know nominations/Riboflavin

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 01:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Riboflavin

Improved to Good Article status by David notMD (talk). Self-nominated at 18:08, 11 December 2021 (UTC).

  • Nice work on the new vital GA. It is new enough, being promoted two days before nomination, and long enough. The hook is interesting, cited and in the article under the Safety section. Sources all appear reliable, mostly from trusted journals that are not predatory. Everything is inline sourced to them, also keeping in mind WP:SCG. Earwig only picks up short phrases or technical terms, will AGF on not copying from offline sources. Article is neutral. So, pending QPQ. eviolite (talk) 19:40, 11 December 2021 (UTC)
To T:DYK/P5