- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 11:33, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Tom Eastick
Improved to Good Article status by Peacemaker67 (talk). Self-nominated at 10:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC).
- Starting this review shortly. Updates to follow. Ktin (talk) 03:47, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough
|
|
|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
|
|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
|
|
|
Overall: 
Article meets eligibility criteria i.e. recently promoted to GA and definitely meets length minimums. Article is well sourced. Love the way the sources have been categorized! I will assume WP:AGF on all offline sources. Nice work. Tone of the article is neutral. Can the nominator rework ALT0. Particularly 'Predict gun data to ...' can be reworded. ALT1 looks good. Can be made more 'interesting' I presume, but, I will let the nominator take a final call with that. QPQ is pending. Earwig copyvio shows a higher number, but, no copyvio seen. Ktin (talk) 04:12, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- G'day Ktin, QPQ done, and trimmed ALT0. Prefer ALT0. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:18, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Howdy @Peacemaker67:. ALT0 reads good to me. Striking ALT1. QPQ done. Approving ALT0. Ktin (talk) 06:24, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- Howdy there, Peacemaker67! Any chance you could cite the hook inline before I promote? theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/she) 10:55, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
- G’day Theleekycauldron, done. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 12:22, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
To
T:DYK/P2
Article meets eligibility criteria i.e. recently promoted to GA and definitely meets length minimums. Article is well sourced. Love the way the sources have been categorized! I will assume WP:AGF on all offline sources. Nice work. Tone of the article is neutral. Can the nominator rework ALT0. Particularly 'Predict gun data to ...' can be reworded. ALT1 looks good. Can be made more 'interesting' I presume, but, I will let the nominator take a final call with that. QPQ is pending. Earwig copyvio shows a higher number, but, no copyvio seen. Ktin (talk) 04:12, 12 December 2021 (UTC)