- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Nineteen Ninety-Four guy talk 06:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Veto (card game)
... that Veto was a Polish collectible card game inspired by the history of Poland, published from 2004 to 2017?Source: see Mochocki 2017 and 2024, cited in the article- Reviewed:
- Comment: QPQ pending. This is my article translated by another editor from pl wiki.
Created by Piotrus (talk) and Oliwiasocz (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 520 past nominations.
Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 14:50, 24 September 2024 (UTC).
Article is new enough and long enough. The sources do seem to suggest the subject exists. The article seems sourced and presentable. The proposed hook seems quite bland, stating only that a historical card game exists. It doesn't even convey the fun concept of the liberum veto I assume the game is named after, although the article does not mention this either. Some new hook options are needed. As an administrative point, there is now somewhat of a consensus that QPQs should be included with nominations, so there is a need to carry it out here soon. Best, CMD (talk) 20:15, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Chipmunkdavis: How about this ALT1: ... that Veto, inspired by the history of Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, is considered the first Polish collectible card game?
- QPQ done: Template:Did you know nominations/Ava–Hanthawaddy War (1401–1403). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:14, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. That's a better hook, but it would be good to get something very specific. Rather than the broad history of the Commonwealth, I would prefer an alt that specifically mentions the machinations of the Sjem (if somewhat dramatised). CMD (talk) 04:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Chipmunkdavis: So would I, but to my surprise, I couldn't find any RS that make this obvious connection explicit. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 06:16, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. That's a better hook, but it would be good to get something very specific. Rather than the broad history of the Commonwealth, I would prefer an alt that specifically mentions the machinations of the Sjem (if somewhat dramatised). CMD (talk) 04:39, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
&sq=&lang=&file=File:Symbol_question.svg){kind=small}
&sq=&lang=&file=File:Symbol_voting_keep.svg){kind=small}