- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 00:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Werner Flume
- ... that Werner Flume called a fellow academic assistant a pig for demanding the boycott of professors of Jewish descent in 1933? Source: See the three citations in the article (sadly, only in German). A Google book link here: https://books.google.de/books?id=zAn9lApFpBcC&pg=PA79&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
- ALT1: ... that Werner Flume has been called a "jurist of the century"? Source: See the citations in the article a PDF here: https://www.zjs-online.com/dat/artikel/2008_6_135.pdf (title and p. 676)
Created by WatkynBassett (talk). Self-nominated at 19:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC).
New enough in mainspace and long enough. User is QPQ exempt.
- @WatkynBassett: Inline citation needed to end the paragraph ending in
During his studies, Flume was particularly influenced by Fritz Schulz, a Roman law scholar.
- AGF ALT0 (offline sources) and ALT1 (which seems to check out). ALT1 is drier than ALT0, which I prefer.
- No textual issues.
- @WatkynBassett: Inline citation needed to end the paragraph ending in
- The inline citation issue is the only blocker from approval. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 00:37, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie: Many thanks for your valuable review and your good copy edits to the article. I tried to address your missing citation concern: In the new citation it is written that Fritz Schulz was his academic teacher in Bonn ("Dort fand er in dem Romanisten Fritz Schulz seinen akademischen Lehrer"; "There he found his academic teacher in the Roman law scholar Fritz Schulz."), which in my mind is enough verification for the stated claim, but I see that this is clearly an edge case. If you prefer deletion of the claim, I would of course be content with it. Thank you again and sorry for the long delay ... WatkynBassett (talk) 12:30, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- @WatkynBassett: I think the source would not support "influence" but should note that he received his doctorate under Schulz. Once that's done, this can be approved. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:41, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie: As I found no direct source for the claim that the dissertation was supervised by Schulz, even if this is almost certain, I rewrote the sentence to: "During his studies in Bonn, Fritz Schulz – a Roman law scholar – became the academic teacher of Flume." Maybe this is more aligned with the sources? Thanks again! WatkynBassett (talk) 19:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Yes, this reads well and matches the source. This is ready. Thanks for working with me. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:36, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- I have to give thanks to you! Was a real pleasure, @Sammi Brie:! WatkynBassett (talk) 19:45, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie: As I found no direct source for the claim that the dissertation was supervised by Schulz, even if this is almost certain, I rewrote the sentence to: "During his studies in Bonn, Fritz Schulz – a Roman law scholar – became the academic teacher of Flume." Maybe this is more aligned with the sources? Thanks again! WatkynBassett (talk) 19:05, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- @WatkynBassett: I think the source would not support "influence" but should note that he received his doctorate under Schulz. Once that's done, this can be approved. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:41, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Sammi Brie: Many thanks for your valuable review and your good copy edits to the article. I tried to address your missing citation concern: In the new citation it is written that Fritz Schulz was his academic teacher in Bonn ("Dort fand er in dem Romanisten Fritz Schulz seinen akademischen Lehrer"; "There he found his academic teacher in the Roman law scholar Fritz Schulz."), which in my mind is enough verification for the stated claim, but I see that this is clearly an edge case. If you prefer deletion of the claim, I would of course be content with it. Thank you again and sorry for the long delay ... WatkynBassett (talk) 12:30, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
