ZIZ
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Typhoon Virginia (1957)
- Comment: It all started last weekend when I Googled up "Caribbean broadcasting call signs" while browsing results for various regional TV stations on a whim. A GBooks result offered a tidbit on an entity called VP2LO, a shortwave outlet that in the years ahead evolved into the Kittitian national broadcaster--a topic I broke ground on back in my early days on WP. (I was lucky to save it from A7 during its December 2007 launch--barely.) Face it, WP is still in dire need of better and more extensive coverage on Caribbean media.
- Apologies if I used a thesis here, but regrettably, it's the only source mentioning this factoid--anywhere--as far as Google's aware (WP:AGF). Meanwhile, as I type, Doc Taxon at WP:RX has been taking care of the last three bits we need to get this finished.
- First of two DYK candidates of mine before Milton approaches my home area; see you in another couple of hours with the next one.
- P.S. Wonder if there are any established editors from Saint Kitts and Nevis itself? (I myself hail from Dominica.)
- P.P.S. As always, special greetings to Barbados' CaribDigita (talk · contribs) and Trinidad's Guettarda (talk · contribs)--along with SafariScribe (talk · contribs), who approved one of my recent go-rounds at AFC, The Right and the Wrong.
5x expanded by
Slgrandson (
talk).
Number of QPQs required:
1. Nominator has 13 past nominations.
Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 23:52, 8 October 2024 (UTC).
- Starting review...
- Article is long enough.
- DYK Check is claiming that the 5x requirement is not met. Slgrandson could you walk me through the details of when you began and finish the 5x expansion?
- QPQ supplied, although based on recent discussions, some might not consider it a full review.
- Sourcing generally appears fine with WP:RS (except see below) and appropriate in-line citations.
- Earwig doesn't call out any copyvio problems.
- TIL the word "calypsonian"
- Hook fact is mentioned in the article, but I'm not sure we can accept the source. WP:SCHOLARSHIP says
Masters dissertations and theses are considered reliable only if they can be shown to have had significant scholarly influence
. Can that be shown for this thesis? If not, then we'll need a different hook. RoySmith (talk) 02:30, 12 November 2024 (UTC)