GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
This template should always be substituted. |
Horizontal layout:
{{subst:GABox|1a=|1b=|2a=|2b=|2c=|2d=|3a=|3b=|4=|5=|6a=|6b=|7=}}
Vertical layout:
{{subst:GABox
|1a=
|1b=
|2a=
|2b=
|2c=
|2d=
|3a=
|3b=
|4=
|5=
|6a=
|6b=
|7=
}}
Available arguments are the following; any other argument or no argument at all gives an undecided mark. Note that the template should be substituted, as the GA guidelines are reviewed from time to time and this template may be changed.
TemplateData for GABox
Review template for Good Article nominees
Parameter | Description | Type | Status | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Criterion 1a | 1a | Well written; the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
| String | suggested |
Criterion 1b | 1b | Well written; the article complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
| String | suggested |
Criterion 2a | 2a | Verifiable with no original research: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
| String | suggested |
Criterion 2b | 2b | Verifiable with no original research: all inline citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines;
| String | suggested |
Criterion 2c | 2c | Verifiable with no original research: the article contains no original research
| String | suggested |
Criterion 2d | 2d | Verifiable with no original research: the article contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism
| String | suggested |
Criterion 3a | 3a | Broad in its coverage: the article addresses the main aspects of the topic
| String | suggested |
Criterion 3b | 3b | Broad in its coverage: the article stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail
| String | suggested |
Criterion 4 | 4 | Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
| String | suggested |
Criterion 5 | 5 | Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
| String | suggested |
Criterion 6a | 6a | Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
| String | suggested |
Criterion 6b | 6b | Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: media are relevant to the topic and have suitable captions
| String | suggested |
Overall status | 7 | Overall status of the article being reviewed
| String | suggested |
y
, yes
, pass
, good
, ok
, k
, +
, aye
all produce a pass symbol: n
, no
, fail
, bad
, nk
, -
, nay
all produce a fail symbol: ?
, ??
, ???
, dunno
, question
, huh
all produce a question symbol: wtf
produces Wikipedia's "I am out of my comfort zone" symbol: hold
and on hold
produce the on hold symbol: neu
, neutral
and und
produce the neutral symbol: