A good article community reassessment is stored on a subpage of the main good article reassessment page. Your first job in initiating a community reassessment is to create such a subpage, and that is the purpose of the edit box below.
Leave an assessment on this page, detailing your reasons for bringing the article to good article reassessment. List the problems you found with the article in comparison to the good article criteria. If you believe the article should be delisted, be sure to mention which of the good article criteria the article does not meet. Sign it, then save this page.
Return to the article talk page to transclude this page there, making it is more visible to other editors: Create a new section named "Community reassessment" and paste in {{Template:GAR/editintro2}}
.
The reassessment may be continued later by editing this page.
All good articles must meet the good article criteria. For more information about reassessment, please read the instructions for reassessment. You may ask any questions or seek help at the good article help desk.
This template may have no transclusions, because it is substituted by a tool or script, it is used as part of a short-term or less active Wikipedia process, or for some other reason. |
{{GAR/link}} subtemplates:
{{GAR/current}}
with {{subst:GAR/result|result=result}}
This purpose of this template is to help editors add {{Article history}} actions to record the outcome of good article reassessment activities. To close a reassessment, remove the {{GAR/link}} template and substitute this one into the {{Article history}} template. Please only do this if you are confident with using {{Article history}}, and check for the red error category afterwards.
For individual reassessments use:
{{subst:GAR/AH|action number|result=result|page=talk subpage number}}
For community reassessments use:
{{subst:GAR/AH|action number|result=result|GARpage=GAR discussion page number}}
If the GARpage is omitted, it is assumed to be 1.