Thank you for listing your dispute at Wikipedia:Third opinion. Your request did not follow the guidelines for listing disputes. These guidelines are in place to ensure that the editor who writes the Third Opinion is not biased, and that they can easily see what the dispute is about.
The description of the dispute should be concise and neutral, and you should sign with the timestamp only. A concise and neutral description means that only the subject matter of the dispute should be described, and not your (nor anyone else's) views on it. For example, in a dispute about reliable sources, do not write "They think this source is unreliable", but rather write "Disagreement about the reliability of a source". To sign with only the timestamp, and without your username, use five tildes (~~~~~) instead of four.
Your request for a Third Opinion may have been edited by another editor to follow the guidelines - feel free to edit it again if you feel it's necessary. If the dispute is of such a nature that it cannot follow the guidelines, another part of the dispute resolution process may be able to help you.
This template should always be substituted (i.e., use {{subst:Uw-3o}} ). Any accidental transclusions will be automatically substituted by a bot. |
How to use:
{{subst:Uw-3o}}
{{subst:Uw-3o|Article}}
references a specific article{{subst:Uw-3o|Article|Additional text}}
adds text onto the end of the message instead of "Thank you"{{subst:Uw-3o||Additional text}}
or {{subst:Uw-3o|2=Additional text}}
also adds text onto the end of the message instead of "Thank you", but doesn't link a page as specified by the article.
{{subst:Uw-3o}}
rather than {{Uw-3o}}
.1=
" if the article contains an equals sign and use "2=
" if the additional text contains an equals sign (such as a URL).