Template talk:Anticonvulsants

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pharmacology This template is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles Medicine This template is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles

Is there any way to make this box less bulky? JFW | T@lk 20:52, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this, it should be changed, as it is not very pretty (to say at the least) right now! --WS 05:34, 1 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just get rid of it. This seems to be what's happening to these gargantuan templates elsewhere. If there's that much to organise, it should be a category, not a template.

Does anyone mind if I go ahead and do this? -- N3X15 ^{( Scream · Contribs)} 17:39, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You mean: delete the template, all the sub-templates, and everywhere it is used? I wouldn't mourn their loss and agree that the category system is more useful for such a large list. However, I think you might want to first post a message on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Drugs and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Clinical medicine. This will affect about 60 articles! --Colin°^Talk 22:34, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Following recent discussions (Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2006-07-09_Pharmacology_Templates and notice of this discussion placed in CLINMED & Drug projects), ATC code need only be in title bar (for anyone who wants to see treatment classification scheme), and comma separate items vs current brackets is more compact. Items within a group then sorted alphabetically. David Ruben ^Talk 23:27, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]