This template is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
This template is within the scope of the WikiProject Assyria, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Assyrian-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.AssyriaWikipedia:WikiProject AssyriaTemplate:WikiProject AssyriaAssyrian articles
I have unilaterally made a series of corrections to the spelling of certain kings’ name, as I thought these would not be particularly controversial, but the place where this template really needs attention is the Dynasty VIII / IX kings and some consensus is needed. Nabu-mukin-apli, the only king shown as belonging to Dynasty VIII, was followed by two of his sons, Ninurta-kudurri-usur II and Mar-biti-ahhe-iddina, who are here shown as founding Dynasty IX, which is hardly likely. Also Mar-biti-ahhe-iddina is shown on the “List of kings of Babylon” page as reigning from 943 to 920 BC, but there is no evidence of when his reign ended. It ought to be ca. 943 – … and Shamash-mudammiq’s reign ought to be ca. … – 900 BC, as there is no evidence for when his began. The division into Dynasty VIII and IX is artificial, as the sources generally describe this period as “mixed dynasties” and some assign the whole period from Nabu-mukin-apli (979 BC on) to Nabu-suma-ukin II (732 BC) as the Dynasty of “E.”BigEars42 (talk) 00:21, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]