Template talk:Victorian elections

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Elections and Referendums This template is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles Australia: Victoria / Politics Victorian elections is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles This template is supported by WikiProject Victoria. This template is supported by WikiProject Australian politics.

I've only put in elections for which there are already pages, except for 1985 - thought I might tempt somebody into going back and doing the most recent election without a page! If anyone wants to put in all the elections at some point, they can be found here - List of Victorian Parliaments. But I don't think it is worth creating links to fifty pages which will never be made. George1966 00:18, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've put them all in - even if the articles aren't made, at least it allows people to see when they were. Plus having redlinks may tempt someone! Number 57 09:13, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's a good idea - it's much more confusing, and I very much doubt that anyone will go back beyond the last three or four elections. George1966 02:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How is it confusing to have the election dates in the template? Number 57 10:15, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm also in favour of having all elections in there, it's what we've been doing in all election templates for good sense. —Nightstallion 12:54, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]