Ulmus pumila 'Pinnato-ramosa' | |
---|---|
Species | Ulmus pumila |
Cultivar | 'Pinnato-ramosa' |
Origin | Germany |
The Siberian elm cultivar Ulmus pumila 'Pinnato-ramosa' was raised by Georg Dieck, as Ulmus pinnato-ramosa, at the National Arboretum, Zöschen, Germany, from seed collected for him circa 1890 in the Ili valley, Turkestan (then a region of the Russian Empire, now part of Kazakhstan) by the lawyer and amateur naturalist Vladislav E. Niedzwiecki while in exile there.[1][2] Litvinov (1908) treated it as a variety of Siberian elm, U. pumila var. arborea [3] but this taxon was ultimately rejected by Green, who sank the tree as a cultivar: "in modern terms, it does not warrant recognition at this rank but is a variant of U. pumila maintained and known only in cultivation, and therefore best treated as a cultivar".[4] Herbarium specimens confirm that trees in cultivation in the 20th century as U. pumila L. var. arborea Litv. were no different from 'Pinnato-ramosa' (see 'External links').
'Pinnato-ramosa' is one of a number of elms that have at various times been called 'Turkestan Elm'.[5] That name has also been applied to dense-branched Central Asian elms like U. densa and 'Androssowii',[6] to U. turkestanica Regel[7] (which Elwes and Henry confused with 'Pinnato-ramosa' in their Synonymy list[8] but which Regel himself had regarded as a form of field elm[9]), and to U. minor 'Umbraculifera' (which Green considered synonymous with Ulmus turkestanica Regel, naming it U. 'Turkestanica'[4]). The Späth nursery of Berlin, Kew Gardens, and the Arboretum national des Barres treated U. turkestanica Regel as a cultivar distinct from U. pinnato-ramosa and 'Umbraculifera'.[10][11][12][13][14]
Ottawa1899
was invoked but never defined (see the help page).{{cite book}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)