United Haulers Assn., Inc. v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Mgmt. Auth. | |
---|---|
![]() | |
Argued January 9, 2007 Decided April 30, 2007 | |
Full case name | United Haulers Association, Inc., et al., Petitioners v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority, et al. |
Citations | 550 U.S. 330 (more) 127 S. Ct. 1786; 167 L. Ed. 2d 655; 2007 U.S. LEXIS 4746; 75 U.S.L.W. 4277; 64 ERC (BNA) 1129; 41 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 601; 37 ELR 20097; 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 238 |
Holding | |
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Plurality | Roberts, joined by Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer |
Concurrence | Scalia (in part) |
Concurrence | Thomas (in judgment) |
Dissent | Alito, joined by Stevens, Kennedy |
Laws applied | |
Dormant Commerce Clause |
United Haulers Ass'n v. Oneida-Herkimer Solid Waste Management Authority, 550 U.S. 330 (2007), was a United States Supreme Court case about interstate commerce. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion of the Court, holding that New York county ordinances forcing private waste management companies to deliver waste to a public facility did not discriminate against interstate commerce. Justice Samuel Alito wrote a dissent.