United States v. Continental Can Co. | |
---|---|
Argued April 28, 1964 Decided June 22, 1964 | |
Full case name | United States v. Continental Can Co., et al. |
Citations | 378 U.S. 441 (more) |
Case history | |
Prior | Motion to dismiss granted, 217 F. Supp. 761 (S.D.N.Y. 1963) |
Holding | |
Section 7 of the Clayton Act, which prohibits a corporation from acquiring another company when it results in a substantial reduction in competition, applies to competition between different industries for the same end user market. Southern District of New York reversed and remanded. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | White, joined by Warren, Black, Douglas, Clark, Brennan, Goldberg |
Concurrence | Goldberg |
Dissent | Harlan, joined by Stewart |
Laws applied | |
15 U.S.C. § 18 (Clayton Act § 7) |
United States v. Continental Can Co., 378 U.S. 441 (1964), was a U.S. Supreme Court case which addressed antitrust issues. One issue it addressed was how should a market segment be defined for purposes of reviewing a merger of companies which manufacture different but related products.