United States v. Hatter | |
---|---|
Argued February 20, 2001 Decided May 21, 2001 | |
Full case name | United States, Petitioner v. Terry J. Hatter, Judge of the District Court for the Central District of California, et al. |
Citations | 532 U.S. 557 (more) 121 S. Ct. 1782; 149 L. Ed. 2d 820 |
Case history | |
Prior | 203 F.3d 795 (Fed. Cir. 2000), affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded. |
Holding | |
The Compensation Clause bars the government from collecting Social Security taxes from federal judges who held office before Congress extended those taxes; Medicare taxes can be collected. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Breyer, joined by Rehnquist, Kennedy, Souter, Ginsburg |
Concur/dissent | Scalia |
Concur/dissent | Thomas |
Stevens and O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. |
United States v. Hatter, 532 U.S. 557 (2001), was a United States Supreme Court case decided in 2001. The case concerned an alleged violation of the Compensation Clause of the United States Constitution when Congress extended Medicare and Social Security taxes to federal judge salaries. Additionally, the case dealt with whether a later increase of federal judge salaries, greater than the new taxes, remedied the potential violation.