United States v. Miller | |
---|---|
Argued March 30, 1939 Decided May 15, 1939 | |
Full case name | United States vs. Jack Miller, et al. |
Citations | 307 U.S. 174 (more) |
Case history | |
Prior | Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Arkansas |
Holding | |
The National Firearms Act, as applied to transporting in interstate commerce a 12-gauge shotgun with a barrel less than 18 inches long, without having registered it and without having in his possession a stamp-affixed written order for it, was not unconstitutional as an invasion of the reserved powers of the states and did not violate the Second Amendment of the US Constitution. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | McReynolds, joined by Hughes, Butler, Stone, Roberts, Black, Reed, Frankfurter |
Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Laws applied | |
National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA) |
United States v. Miller, 307 U.S. 174 (1939), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that involved a Second Amendment to the United States Constitution challenge to the National Firearms Act of 1934 (NFA). The case is often cited in the ongoing American gun politics debate, as both sides claim that it supports their position.