This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. (May 2014) |
United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative | |
---|---|
Argued March 28, 2001 Decided May 14, 2001 | |
Full case name | United States of America v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative |
Citations | 532 U.S. 483 (more) 121 S. Ct. 1711; 149 L. Ed. 2d 722; 2001 U.S. LEXIS 3518 |
Case history | |
Prior | United States v. Cannabis Cultivators Club, 5 F. Supp. 2d 1086 (N.D. Cal. 1998); reversed sub. nom., United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative, 190 F.3d 1109 (9th Cir. 1999); cert. granted, 531 U.S. 1010 (2000). |
Holding | |
There is no medical necessity defense to a charge under the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 841 et seq. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Thomas, joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy |
Concurrence | Stevens (in judgment), joined by Souter, Ginsburg |
Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. | |
Laws applied | |
21 U.S.C. § 841 et seq. |
In United States v. Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative, 532 U.S. 483 (2001), the United States Supreme Court rejected the common-law medical necessity defense to crimes enacted under the federal Controlled Substances Act of 1970,[1] regardless of their legal status under the laws of states such as California that recognize a medical use for marijuana.[2] Oakland Cannabis Buyers' Cooperative was represented by Gerald Uelmen.