US v. Palomar-Santiago | |
---|---|
Argued April 27, 2021 Decided May 24, 2021 | |
Full case name | United States v. Refugio Palomar-Santiago |
Docket no. | 20-437 |
Citations | 593 U.S. ___ (more) |
Argument | Oral argument |
Holding | |
All three requirements of 8 USC § 1326(d) is mandatory. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinion | |
Majority | Sotomayor, unanimous |
United States v. Palomar-Santiago, No. 20-437, 593 U.S. ___ (2021) was a United States Supreme Court case that dealt with the three requirements under which a deportation order may be dismissed, as listed in 8 USC § 1326(d). The question brought before the Court was whether Palomar-Santiago may be excused from meeting all three requirements, given that the offense he was initially deported for was subsequently found no longer deportable. The Court held that all three requirements must be met in order to dismiss a deportation order.[1]