| United States v. Strong | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit |
| Decided | July 19, 2013 |
| Citation | 724 F.3d 51 (1st Cir. 2013). |
| Case history | |
| Appealed from | United States District Court for the District of Maine |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | Sandra Lynch, Juan R. Torruella, & William J. Kayatta Jr. |
| Case opinions | |
| Decision by | Sandra Lynch |
| Concurrence | William J. Kayatta Jr. |
| Dissent | Juan R. Torruella |
| Keywords | |
In United States v. Ronald J. Strong, 724 F.3d 51 (1st Cir. 2013),[1] the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit had to consider if the violation of federal regulations occurring on a federal property could still stand if such regulations had not met posting requirements.
- ^ United States v. Strong, 724 F.3d 51 (1st Cir. 2013).