United States v. Texas | |
---|---|
Argued November 29, 2022 Decided June 23, 2023 | |
Full case name | United States, et al. v. Texas, et al. |
Docket no. | 22-58 |
Citations | 599 U.S. 670 (more) 143 S. Ct. 1964 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Opinion announcement | Opinion announcement |
Questions presented | |
(1) Whether the state plaintiffs have Article III standing to challenge the Department of Homeland Security's Guidelines for the Enforcement of Civil Immigration Law; and (2) Whether the Guidelines are contrary to or , or otherwise violate the Administrative Procedure Act; and (3) Whether prevents the entry of an order to "hold unlawful and set aside" the Guidelines under . | |
Holding | |
Texas and Louisiana lack Article III standing to challenge the Guidelines. | |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Kavanaugh, joined by Roberts, Sotomayor, Kagan, Jackson |
Concurrence | Gorsuch (in judgment), joined by Thomas, Barrett |
Concurrence | Barrett (in judgment), joined by Gorsuch |
Dissent | Alito |
Laws applied | |
U.S. Const. art. III |
United States v. Texas, 599 U.S. 670 (2023), was a United States Supreme Court case related to federal immigration law.