United States v. Young (1985)

United States v. Young
Argued October 2, 1984
Decided February 20, 1985
Full case nameUnited States v. Billy G. Young
Citations470 U.S. 1 (more)
105 S.Ct. 1038
ArgumentOral argument
Case history
PriorUnited States v. Young, 736 F.2d 565 (10th Cir. 1984)
Holding
Judgement reversed:
  1. Trial judges should immediately address unprofessional advocacy for the guilt of the defendant
  2. Review of prosecutorial statements must consider whether they were invited by the defense
  3. Judicial review of statements unchallenged during the original trial is only warranted when the error would undermine the trial's fairness
Court membership
Chief Justice
Warren E. Burger
Associate Justices
William J. Brennan Jr. · Byron White
Thurgood Marshall · Harry Blackmun
Lewis F. Powell Jr. · William Rehnquist
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Case opinions
MajorityBurger, joined by White, Powell, Rehnquist, O'Connor
Concur/dissentBrennan, joined by Marshall, Blackmun
DissentStevens

United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1 (1985), is a United States Supreme Court case holding that while trial judges should immediately address the misconduct of prosecutors and defense attorneys, remarks that go unchallenged during the trial can be reviewed by appellate courts if the error would undermine the trial's fairness, and a retrial should be considered if the remarks were uninvited by the other side.