United States v. Young | |
---|---|
Argued October 2, 1984 Decided February 20, 1985 | |
Full case name | United States v. Billy G. Young |
Citations | 470 U.S. 1 (more) 105 S.Ct. 1038 |
Argument | Oral argument |
Case history | |
Prior | United States v. Young, 736 F.2d 565 (10th Cir. 1984) |
Holding | |
Judgement reversed:
| |
Court membership | |
| |
Case opinions | |
Majority | Burger, joined by White, Powell, Rehnquist, O'Connor |
Concur/dissent | Brennan, joined by Marshall, Blackmun |
Dissent | Stevens |
United States v. Young, 470 U.S. 1 (1985), is a United States Supreme Court case holding that while trial judges should immediately address the misconduct of prosecutors and defense attorneys, remarks that go unchallenged during the trial can be reviewed by appellate courts if the error would undermine the trial's fairness, and a retrial should be considered if the remarks were uninvited by the other side.