I usually vote in almost every one of the few RfA's that come through here, and while I'm a bit more lenient than most in terms of things like edit count, AfD participation, content creation, etc., I still need to see certain things before I am willing to support your run for adminship. Back in the olden days of Wikipedia, as many others have observed, the system worked more on trust; people could pass with just several months' experience and an edit count in the upper triple figures, but now most people have very high requirements before they even think of filing a "support" vote, to the tune of several years' experience and five- or even six-figure edit counts. I have been a Wikipedia editor since 2014 and have amassed roughly 3700 edits as of this writing in December 2017 (now roughly 4600 edits as of June 2018), and I consider myself a moderately experienced editor, though I do not know all of the many rules and policies inside and out, and neither do most others. Here are my requirements, broken down into stuff I like, stuff that might help me decide, and outright deal-breakers.