• 158.62.27.90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 957 five times in the last 5 minutes (Removal of article lead, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 03:04, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

  Warned user. Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• 103.152.75.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped disruption-catching filters five times in the last 5 minutes (details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 04:02, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

  No edits since being warned. Re-report if this user continues vandalising or spamming after sufficient warnings. Although at some point it's going to catch up with them. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• 207.144.253.54 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) – Tripped filter 231 five times in the last 5 minutes (Long string of characters containing no spaces, details). Report false positive. DatBot (talk) 18:16, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

  Warned user. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 18:54, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• 196.121.188.24 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) Sneaky vandalism. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

  Warned user. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 17:02, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 5 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 2 items

Requested RD1 redactions – 32 items

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

• Sirrom The Rapper (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Zsohl^(Talk) 15:06, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

  Not a violation of the username policy. Real names are permitted except when they imply that the editor is a specific living person they are not. Consider filing a report at the conflict of interest noticeboard. Stage names are treated the same as real names. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 15:49, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• Lkostrik (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. Impersonating Leondios G. Kostrikis (evident from edit summaries) and adding links to the page. Agent 007 (talk) 18:25, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
• Csg pakistan (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) – Violation of the username policy as a promotional username. WP:CORPNAME, promotional content on user talk page. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:58, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

• J. D. Vance (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary Extended-Protection: High level of unreasonable and arbitrary edits.

Hi, please temporarily make this article extended-protected because there are too much people editing with many errors and also a low level of vandalism have occurred on this article. Also, there are a bunch of unnecessary and arbitrary edits. 2601:646:8003:6B20:F819:E192:5DCA:B36F (talk) 06:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 13:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• Sisanda Henna (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Addition of content sourced to IMDb or unsourced, not neutral in tone, editor's username suggests conflict of interest. Recently protected fir the same reason, expired a week ago. Tacyarg (talk) 08:52, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

User(s) blocked. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 14:02, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• RRR (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 08:53, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Supporting a temporary FP, users Jayanthkumar123 and SaibaK been edit warring. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Note: One user partially blocked for 24 hours and the other warned about edit warring. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 14:11, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• Second Battle of Shuja'iyya (2024) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended-confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Per WP:PIA, non ECP users changing the results of the battle Wiiformii (talk) 15:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• Mr. Bean in Room 426 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – edit warring. IP-hopper keeps reverting back to a version with a needlessly longer summary. CRBoyer 15:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• Ajuran Sultanate (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Article has been subjected to mass sockpuppet edits since at least March 2024. Looking through its history: Sabtamarka, Jinsicad, Philantro Man, Thehamid, Ynilsa, Service Providers, Coastalmerch and possibly others are all sockpuppets constituting the vast majority of edits (except for editors like Whoopsawa who are trying to clean up some of the sock edits). Many of the IP edits are likely logged-out socks as well. R Prazeres (talk) 16:43, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• MTV (Latin American TV channel) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced content. Waxworker (talk) 16:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:03, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• Stitch! (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – An IP user who, for many years (going back to at least May 2013), has been obsessively trying add false information about a non-existent crossover between this Disney anime series and characters from the non-Disney-owned educational animated children's series Dragon Tales (along with other IPs such as Teletubbies) has returned after over two-and-a-half years since their last series of edits to continue their years-long attempt to add their crossover idea to the article. Their unusual obsession with this idea and long history of vandalizing edits should prove that this article needs an indefinite semi-protection to prevent any future attempts to restore these edits.

Here's a history of the days their edits were reverted (in reverse chronological order):

I apologize for the collapsible list if it's not appropriate to use here, but I didn't want my report to appear so overwhelmingly large by using a regular, unhidden bulleted list.–WPA (talk) 17:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• Without You (Mariah Carey recording) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Heartfox (talk) 17:34, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• ITV plc (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Ongoing false statements about a Paramount takeover, per previous edit protection and Talk:ITV_plc#False_take-over_claims. Belbury (talk) 18:42, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• List of equipment of the People's Liberation Army Ground Force (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – see page history, persistent effort by IPs who I can only assume to be an LTA to falsify referenced content i.e. subtle vandalism. Loafiewa (talk) 18:48, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

• C1K98V (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello, I have created 100+ articles, primarily focused on television series. And I plan to keep doing the same. Thanks for your consideration C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 08:51, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Link to previous request. (I have no opinion at this time.) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:36, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Extraordinary Writ, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 05:50, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Joe Roe, you declined this previously. Do you want to have another look? Schwede66 06:42, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry I don't have time to look at this properly right now. I'm happy for another admin to process it as they see fit. – Joe (talk) 09:33, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Joe Roe, I appreciate it. Thanks for looking into my request. — C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 09:47, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

• 12eeWikiUser (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have been contributing to Wikipedia for some time now and have made numerous constructive edits, focusing mainly on Global South topics. I believe that having autopatrolled rights would help streamline my contributions by reducing the workload for the reviewing editors and ensuring quicker article updates.

I have read and understand Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, including those on notability and reliable sourcing. I am committed to maintaining high standards of content quality and adhering to community norms.

If you could consider granting me autopatrolled rights, I would greatly appreciate your consideration. Thanks. 12eeWikiUser (talk) 09:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC) 12eeWikiUser (talk) 09:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry but as a third of the articles you created have been deleted so far, they will need to be patrolled for the foreseeable future.  Not done. – Joe (talk) 10:17, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• Twinkle1990 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Applying for the right as my edits were rationale. I have undergone all the criterions and I fit in all. I am well aware about Star Missispi and Joe Roe's earlier declines, but now I am fully washed and proved myself eligible for the right. From AFD/CSD to AfC reviews, and developing a handful of drafts for acceptance, I can now proudly say that I am eligible for the role. Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:32, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined in the past 90 days ([1]). — MusikBot ^talk 15:40, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

So what MusikBot? What's your problem?? Can't an user improved against AI bot like you? Twinkle1990 (talk) 15:47, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Uh.... that just auto replies showing recently declined requests. I'm really not sure what you think responding to the bot will do. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:37, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

I don't believe I've ever declined a request from autopatrolled from you, Twinkle1990. You had the right revoked by Star Mississippi in June 2023 and subsequent requests for it were denied by Novem Linguae.[2] Hey man im josh,[3] and Rosguill.[4] That last time (two months ago) Rosguill told you it was more of a "never" than a "not now".  Not done and please do not ask again, it is becoming disruptive. – Joe (talk) 15:53, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

@Joe Roe you are an involved admin. Can you please left over to non-involved Admins? Why you are everywhere? User Maximilian Janisch treated you fine while you hammered his article and profile here. Kindly don't abuse you admin POWER. Twinkle1990 (talk) 16:12, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) @Twinkle1990, observing this from the capacity as someone who is not an admin (but none the less a long-time editor), I'd suggest you may consider taking heed of Joe's advice and back away from this for a while (maybe until at least next year). I note in your rationale you consider yourself "suitable for the role", so one may wonder how well you understand what autopatrolled is (though I am sure you know it doesn't impact your editing ability). Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 16:52, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• Pemguincraft (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Reason for requesting confirmed rights

 I am requesting confirmed rights because I am trying to create a new page however I can't do that without confirmed/auto- 
 confirmed permissions. Pemguincraft (talk) 22:13, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done You can propose a new page for creation following the Articles for Creation process. This will allow you to take some time to draft the article and get feedback on it before it becomes a fully-fledged article. stwalkerster (talk) 22:50, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

• Iwaqarhashmi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I would like to apply for the File mover right to rename files. I've been contributing on Commons for quite some time now, and I've been doing lots of good file renaming requests on Wikipedia. The file movers also appreciated my rename requests [5]. I'm a file mover and patroller on Commons, and I've moved over 1000 files so far. I have a good understanding of the renaming guideline, and I think it would be really helpful also having the right here. Thank you! Waqar💬 14:08, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

• KingSkyLord (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have been editing for over 7 years and I plan on using this permission in order to help with discussions on WP:RM and deal with cross-redirects for articles that should have more disambiguated titles. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 12:46, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

• Wikishovel (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello, my page mover privilege has just expired, after 90 days of what I believe to have been productive use in NPP and AFC. Could it be extended please? Thanks. Wikishovel (talk) 06:20, 15 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 19:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

• The Sharpest Lives (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I am requesting page mover rights to help close discussions at WP:RM, if a consensus is clear. – The Sharpest Lives (💬•✏️•ℹ️) (ping me!) 03:39, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• TheNuggeteer (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I am a registered user with more than 6 months of experience and more than 3000 edits, I moved a lot of pages and have created the Requested move for the page Danilo Guades. (I also don't have blocks). 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 09:46, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• Madeforall1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Im requesting pending changes reviewer rights because I wish to review some changes made by inexperienced users, I’ll be fully active and really want to get this right. Madeforall1 (talk) 10:14, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Per your discussion here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funnybros. It shows any editor with the motive to promote a subject either by Youtube link or any other link that are not necessary or accepted by wikipedia. You are likely to accept them. So I will be afraid if this right is being granted to you for the betterment of wikipedia. Administrators should be aware. Gabriel (talk to me ) 11:52, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Honestly, Gabriel101, I've looked at this user's contributions, and they look more than ready to be a reviewer. On top of that, you are requesting the same rights of this user? And though I am saying the same thing as this user did on your request, did you have to say what you said here and not on the user's talk page? Apollogetticax|^talk 06:58, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Point of correction, I am not Gabriel101. And to address your concern. If I had gone to user talk page it could have been useless or a waste of time as the same user has removed everything that was notified against him recently by other editors. I don’t know what you have looked but I see no sense in what you are saying if you have really looked as you said and not noticing an edit was stroked here. Regarding same permission kindly read Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kingdom Achievers Award. I will advice you focus on your Sockpuppet account case User:User:HTML5, CSS3! and here User_talk:Ferret#Thank_you. Cheers. Gabriel (weytin dey sup) 12:00, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done. I think it'd be beneficial for you to get a bit more experience and re-apply later on. Nothing stops you from helping out and fixing inappropriate edits where you find them. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

• Randomstaplers (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I'm starting to review pages for copyvios, and, as a result, I'm starting to encounter reviewer-protected pages. (If the article on Rotten Tomatoes wasn't a backwards-copy, I might have been hosed.) In any case, I hope my experience across multiple Wikimedia projects demonstrates the competence needed for this permission. ⸺RandomStaplers 00:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 20:14, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

• Gabriel601 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I am well familiar with the Wikipedia Copyright violations, Wikipedia Biographies of living persons and much more of Verifiability to other subject aside humans. My main focus are on the WikiProject Nigeria and little works from other Wikiproject. Reason being so I don't get occupied with other subject am not 100% familiar with their source such as Indian and the rest. Gabriel (talk to me ) 12:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

You commented ill about me based on the permission I’m trying to get, the best place was to be my talk page but you came here to say such why? And now you want same permission I’m requesting for? Not cool @Gabriel601Madeforall1 (talk) 06:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done. I think it'd be beneficial for you to get a bit more experience and re-apply later on. Nothing stops you from helping out and fixing inappropriate edits where you find them. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:07, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks. Gabriel (……?) 21:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

• ThatOneWolf (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hey there! I'm ThatOneWolf, and, I know I've been here twice before, but those times I admit I didn't really get the whole idea of experience and stuff. Plus, my last request was months ago. I took a little break recently when I just was checking my talk page and watchlist, but now I've come back to editing.

Anyway, the reason I'm requesting Reviewer rights now is because I feel like I could help in that area, with most of my edits being vandalism reversions. I also feel I suitably warn editors when I think they are intending to vandalize, or just let them know if it seems they could be trying to help. I've read all the policies listed in Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, and am very familiar with the copyright laws. This is why I feel I would be more fit now to receive this right. Thanks for reading! -- ThatOneWolf (^Chat_Edits 12:18, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

• ADifferentMan (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I watch recent changes often for vandalism and problematic edits, and understand the difference between the two when reverting them. I've also reviewed the guidelines on reviewing pending changes. I hope this right can help me more effectively perform anti-vandal work. ADifferentMan (talk) 07:34, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

• Doclys (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello, I am requesting pending changes review rights to improve my anti-vandalism work here on Wikipedia. I frequently revert instances of vandalism and am willing to assist with pending changes revisions. Thank you. — doclys (❀) 14:28, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

• ObserveOwl (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello! I would like to request rollback rights as I've been pretty active in countering vandalism since May. I use Twinkle and I notify new users consistently when I revert, usually by using a warn template, but other times by writing a message myself. I do my best to distinguish between good faith edits and vandalism and avoid unnecessary edit wars. Having made around 20 successful AIV reports, I am interested in making patrolling quicker with Huggle. Thank you! ObserveOwl (chit-chat • my doings) 22:52, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done -Fastily 01:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

• Madeforall1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello, at this point I think I’m ready to fight vandalism and make good rollback edits, I really need this tools to be giving me to me, I’m an experienced editor and I think some editors are really not doing justice in terms of there edits, I want to use the tools to revert some edits that shouldn't be Madeforall1 (talk) 11:56, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([6]). — MusikBot ^talk 12:00, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

User:Madeforall1, you just had a declined request for this permission a few days ago. You were asked to do some work and don't make another request for at least a month but you waited about 5 days. Did you not understand what you were being told? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:49, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done for the exact same reason I declined the previous request. -Fastily 01:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

• Vasil3fonov (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello! I am applying for the role of rollbacker, having been a Wikipedia user for over 10 years and being increasingly active in the last few years. In this vein, I feel that I have undone my fair share of vandalism and, being mainly focused on football/sports articles, vandalism and unconstructive/unsourced edits are very common in my area of interest and editing. I believe that these rights will be very useful in maximising the efficiency of my work on Wikipedia and will save me time from undoing separate edits individually. Additionally, I have past experience as an administrator on a Wikia project, where I made use of the rollback feature and have good knowledge of its positives and when to utilise it. Thank you for taking your time to review my request. Kind regards, Vasil3fonov (talk) 12:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits. Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 01:53, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Firstly, I must say I was not aware of the fact that you have to leave a message for every kind of blatant vandalism that is reverted. I usually do it in cases where the user is registered and appears to have used the account for more than a single edit, where they have also done multiple similar unconstructive edits. Secondly, I did not know what the tools were used for and, usually, when I leave messages regarding things such as vandalism, I do it manually. I will take a look at the tools and perhaps make a future request if I am able to work with them properly. If not, then I suppose I will just stick to my current flow of anti-vandalism work. Thanks, Vasil3fonov (talk) 05:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Sounds good, closing as  Not done -Fastily 08:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• Miminity (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I regularly monitor the "recent change" feed now for about 2 months now, I actively warn users when I revert their edits thanks to twinkle and ultraviolet and actively report the clear vandals and spam accounts. I want to access the rollback rights to make reverting easier as I have slow internet. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 11:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

I see that you are failing to consistently warn editors when you revert their edits. Why? It's important to leave a notification for every revert you make. Are you aware that we have tools such as Twinkle or Ultraviolet that make this extremely easy? -Fastily 08:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

I actively warn users who vandalize/disrupt the pages using Twinkle as well as report them to ARV either after final warning or when an account is clearly for vandalism only, but sometimes I assume good faith just leave a note on their talk page. Warm Regards, Miminity (talk) (contribs) 12:21, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• Doclys (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Hello, I would like to request rollback rights to quickly enhance the process of reviewing RecentChanges. For over a month, I have been patrolling RecentChanges and using Ultraviolet and Twinkle to revert and warn users. Thank you. — doclys (❀) 14:26, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done -Fastily 08:57, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

• Smasongarrison (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I'm requesting template editor privileges due to recent changes that classify parts of the Template:Occupation_by_nationality_and_century_category_header as high risk [7]. I developed this template to help manage occupation categories and have become quite familiar with template syntax over the past year, though I do not consider myself an expert. My expertise lies more in R programming, which I teach as part of a data science class.

I meet nearly all the requirements for template editor privileges, except for having syntax requests implemented in other high-risk templates. While I have edited templates that have become high risk, I acknowledge that this is not the same. However, I have made a sizable number of technical contributions to RegExTypoFix, primarily in optimizing the regular expression. This is the code underlying the spellchecker used by AWB to implement uncontroversial misspellings. If necessary, I am willing to find and suggest syntax changes to further demonstrate my capabilities. Mason (talk) 03:29, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Smasongarrison, that template is only ExCon-protected, and thus you should be able to edit it. It otherwise doesn't sound like you need this permission. Primefac (talk) 13:38, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, I wasn't clear. The core subpage of the template; Template:Occupation by nationality and century category header/outercore has just been changed. [8] Mason (talk) 13:40, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

I'd also be fine if I could just be given edit permission just for Template:Occupation by nationality and century category header and the subpages, if that's a possibility Mason (talk) 13:52, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

Ah, I thought I had checked them all but clearly missed one. I've dropped the protection back down. Primefac (talk) 19:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

 Not done (for the bot) mainly due to lack of indicated need. No prejudice against requesting in the future if protected-template editing becomes more of an issue. Primefac (talk) 23:48, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

• RP88 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I'm requesting template editor permission for some edits related to Wikipedia:WikiProject Ships. I meet all of the guidelines and have held template editor permission in the past (see Special:UserRights/RP88 and Special:PermaLink/805154993 for original grant), but previous template editor permission was dropped during a period of inactivity on my part. I am not sure if it is relevant to en.WP, but as a Commons administrator I have made hundreds of edits to the restricted templates/modules in the Commons Module and Template namespaces. —RP88 ^(talk) 23:45, 20 July 2024 (UTC)

 Done. Primefac (talk) 23:49, 20 July 2024 (UTC)