Review new Project proposals; engage the Sister-Proj committee
Support Wikimanias and liaisons over time; Wikimania committee
Make the Language committee independent; less overhead
Anti-bureaucracy
Propose many policies that should be guidelines
Add a few AB policies for dispute resolution: jury selection, rotating fiat. Reduce total time spent on drama; allow mistakes (you end up with lots of mistakes anyway; often there are no 'good' solutions)
Pro-newbie
Add a few AB/Newb policies for protecting newbies: WikiHow has "no deletion for 3 days" and "no templating on user talk pages"
Add Teahouse links in the sidebar for newbies (auto).
Help newbies cluster by cohort (everyone who joined that week?) with shared updates about one another's work, Newsle style.
Simplify permissions. Most people should have most rights.
Have a standard adminship process: with revisiting every 2 yrs, a la steward review. Low bar to entry and removal; alignment period w/ active mentorship/review.
Have a standard "Requests for Review" queue. Review can lead to "keep, change, merge, delete". Only the last would go to a Delete queue, to decide how to do it.
Improve visualization and measurement
Improve vis. tools for monitors: make it easy for 1 person to track 1000 contributors.
Improve logging of viz-tracking: an important task that should be recognized, enumerable.
Drop notability
Allow drafts of all topics, notable or not. In a new namespace, or on a new Project. Move the drama about notability into productive energy there.
Replicating great ideas and events, across orgs and projects. caption=Paris 2 Wiki
City 2 Wiki, WLM, Tree of Life. Reports, events, models.
