| Look, Love, about your work on the Children Act 1989, I can't say that it was perfect when you did your little bit of work on it—in fact, I only found you when I set out to hunt down a suspected hypothetical Troll or Vandal who I thought was deliberately (either that, or that he was incompetent, because his mother tongue wasn't "English British English") changing the tense of the verb or verbs into the past tense—anyway, just to let you know, in the English language, legislation, unless it was repealed in the entirety (entirely), (usually) uses the present tense (entirely, and throughout)—-still, I thank you for your sterling, steady and steadfast work, effort and dedication, because I think that I myself am probably now a little too old and am probably also a little to disabled and also barking to do half of what you did, without boring or depressing myself to death unless I were to start doing a bit of drink or drugs or sex or some or all of the above on the side! (Well, I wouldn't mind too much, though!) (P.S.: I myself am an amateur mature law student who alas would never actually graduate and never practise law because I am a bit of an invalid, both a bit blind and a bit barking mad. Still, if you live a bit "Up North" (of England), might perhaps meet up some time for a drink or two before Christmas, who knows?!) Anyway, TTFN, Sweetheart! -- Urquhartnite (talk) 10:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC)
|
