User:Syrenka V/Protection not deletion

To a large extent, deletionism appears to be motivated by a desire to counteract spam, undisclosed paid editing, and conflicts of interest.[1] While I agree that these are very serious problems, deletionism is a dysfunctional response to them. More aggressive page protection policies would be a more effective response. Page protection is currently applied too cautiously, and primarily against vandalism, rather than spam. This needs to change.

  1. ^ Cite error: The named reference spam-abbrev was invoked but never defined (see the help page).