{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav + 2 + 5 single cat

BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently

Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – No backlog currently

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item

Requested RD1 redactions – 7 items

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

• TheOtherWrexham (talk · contribs · deleted · filter log · SUL · Google) • (block · soft · promo · cause · bot · hard · spam · vandal) WP:PROMONAME, uses a promotional motto "The Other Wrexham" used by FC United of Wrexham (e.g. youtube.com/@theotherwrexham) which the account solely edits articles related to such club or sandboxing an article on the club's founder, so far. DankJae 20:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

This page has an administrative backlog that requires the attention of willing administrators. Please replace this notice with {{no admin backlog}} when the backlog is cleared.

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

• Steve Cooper (football manager) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Repeated vandalism and speculation over the last 48 hours. ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 09:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• 2025 Polish presidential election (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: IP vandalism and edit warring over the party of a candidate Polish kurd (talk) 11:04, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Please enforce WP:CT/EE. IanDBeacon (talk) 13:22, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Astro Warna (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced conent. Waxworker (talk) 11:08, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Za'atar (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – People constantly changing where the herb mixture comes from. Wiiformii (talk) 14:24, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 21:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Vaibhav Suryavanshi (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: High level of vandalism from IPs after being in news yesterday, request a short period of semi-protection JP (Talk) 14:33, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Mioara Mugur-Schächter (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Anonymous IP keeps adding back information into this WP:BLP page without proper sources. ReyHahn (talk) 15:05, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Seconding the request of @ReyHahn, in fact I was making one at the same time. Note that the anonymous user has also deleted a notability questionable tag, not just added unsourced content. Ldm1954 (talk) 16:11, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Jorhat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite pending changes: persistent ip sockpuppetry on this and other similar articles. Yuthoob (talk) 16:07, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Yeti Airlines Flight 691 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary full protection: Content dispute/edit warring – edit war over a photo, no real discussion. The Banner talk 16:07, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Comment: Something is definitely off when the instigator of said edit war thinks they are exempt from having warning templates inserted on their talk page [1]. Borgenland (talk) 18:31, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Axl Rose (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Trolls and vandals messing with Axl. Downzyisaliar (talk) 16:25, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Palestinian militias in the West Bank (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: New page that falls under WP:CT/A-I; should be extended-confirmed protected. Reconrabbit 17:30, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 21:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• 2024 Romanian presidential election (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Extend protection preferably until after the second round on 8 December. Borgenland (talk) 18:16, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Gladiators (2024 British TV series) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Same editing patterns as before, i.e. text starting "Two new Gladiators..." latest edit [2] as well as adding two random names to the section of the upcoming series. Iggy (Swan) (Contribs) 18:31, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Jani Lauzon (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Reason: A user on Reddit is attempting to invoke WP:MEATPUPPET against this article in an attempt to manufacture consensus about whether Jani Lauzon being referred to as Metis in the lede is accurate [3]. Also see the discussion on Talk:Jani Lauzon. Requesting a short semi-protect as a mitigation measure. AceSevenFive (talk) 18:38, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Talk:Rachel Levine (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Last Talk page protection expired yesterday and immediately thereafter again WP:RD2 level WP:GENSEX violation. Requesting indef semi for talk page as arbitration enforcement as it doesn't appear that there's any end in sight of this vandalism. Raladic (talk) 18:52, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected for a period of 1 year, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 20:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Uttaran (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Temporary semi-protection: IPs adding FANCRUFT in violation of TVCAST and edit warring. CNMall41 (talk) 18:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Encanto (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Disruption by block-evading IP editor. TornadoLGS (talk) 19:04, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:27, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Already protected by administrator Ahecht. Favonian (talk) 20:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• 2024 Israel–Lebanon ceasefire agreement (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – Recent article about the Israeli-Arab conflict. Wiiformii (talk) 20:37, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 21:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Israeli generals' plan (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement – CTOPS. AntiDionysius (talk) 20:55, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Done Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 21:09, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

• To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
• Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
• Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
• If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

• Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
• Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
• Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
• If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
• This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.

• Gaza genocide (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

My suggestion is to leave out the following 2 sentences in the "German complicity" paragraph as they seem to be based on misunderstandings:

"She also highlighted police suppression of pro-Palestine protests throughout Germany[509] as evidence of state complicity.[508] Karen Wells et al. highlight how Germany has entrenched its complicity in Israel's actions by banning use of the word "genocide" in reference to Israel.[471][better source needed]"

1. In general violent protests are not allowed in Germany. As some of the first pro-Palestine protests were violent, they were sometimes forbidden by courts, if they were expected to turn violent. But that is common policy in Gemany with all subjects and not special for pro-Palestine protests.

Meanwhile, there even is a calendar concerning pro-Palestinian protests[4] with daily up to 20 protests all over Germany. Thus, there is no general police suppression of pro-Palestine protests as is suggested by the current wording.

2. The word “genocide” is not banned in reference to Israel in Germany - maybe that was a misunderstanding: What is not allowed in Germany is to call for genocide against Jews. The slogan “From the river to the sea” is seen as such call and banned. Gilbert04 (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

@FortunateSons: A quick browse shows at least for the first part support for removal, can you add any additional incite? -- Cdjp1 (talk) 12:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

I can confirm that both statements are broadly true. IMO, the best resource for this discussion (in the contemporary context) is probably Steinberg: Versammlungsfreiheit nach dem 7. Oktober - NVwZ 2024, 302. Direct citation: “Die Subsumtion unter diesen Tatbestand bereitet aber auch sonst Probleme. Die Stadt Frankfurt a. M. hatte dem Anmelder einer Versammlung „Frieden in Nahost" am 2.12.2023 untersagt, während der Versammlung zur Vernichtung Israels aufzurufen, dem Staat Israel das Existenzrecht abzusprechen, sowie die Aussagen „Israel Kindermörder", „Juden Kindermörder", „Israel bringt Kinder um" sowie „From the river to the sea" zu tätigen. Diese Beschränkungen hob das VG Frankfurt vollständig auf. Auf die Beschwerde der Stadt differenzierte der VGH Kassel Aufrufe zur Vernichtung Israels verstießen - wie gesagt - gegen § 111 StGB und die Aussage „Juden Kindermörder" erfülle den Tatbestand der Volksverhetzung (§ 130 StGB). Demgegenüber wurden andere Außerungen wie „Kindermörder Israel" oder die Bezeichnung der israelischen Militäroperationen in Gaza als „Genozid" nicht beanstandet und die Entscheidung des VG insoweit aufrechterhalten. Es sei davon auszugehen, dass bei den militärischen Verteidigungshandlungen Israels auch Kinder zu Schaden kämen. Eine solche laienhafte Zuspitzung sei im Rahmen der Meinungsfreiheit hinzunehmen. Anders hatte der VGH Mannheim am 21.10.2023 ein Verbot der Parole „Israel Kindermörder" und „Israel bringt Kinder um" durch die Versammlungsbehörde trotz bestehender Zweifel über deren Strafbarkeit aufrechterhalten; im Verfahren des vorläufigen Rechtsschutzes sei nur eine summarische Prüfung möglich; eine einmal getätigte Äußerung könne nicht rückgängig gemacht werden. Die Unterscheidung zwischen antisemitisch und antiisraelisch stellt sicherlich eine Gratwanderung dar, die hier im Einzelnen nicht beschrieben werden kann“autotranslated: “However, the subsumption under this offense also causes other problems. On December 2, 2023, the city of Frankfurt am Main had prohibited the person registering a meeting "Peace in the Middle East" from calling for the destruction of Israel during the meeting, from denying the State of Israel the right to exist, and from making the statements "Israel, child murderer," "Jews, child murderer," "Israel kills children" and "From the river to the sea." The Administrative Court of Frankfurt completely lifted these restrictions. In response to the city's complaint, the Administrative Court of Kassel differentiated that calls for the destruction of Israel violated - as mentioned - Section 111 of the Criminal Code and that the statement "Jews, child murderer" constituted incitement to hatred (Section 130 of the Criminal Code). In contrast, other statements such as "Israel, child murderer" or the description of Israeli military operations in Gaza as "genocide" were not objected to and the Administrative Court's decision was upheld in this respect. It can be assumed that children would also be harmed in Israel's military defense actions. Such a lay exaggeration must be accepted within the framework of freedom of expression. On October 21, 2023, the Mannheim Higher Administrative Court upheld a ban on the slogans "Israel, child murderer" and "Israel kills children" by the assembly authority despite existing doubts about their criminal liability; in the interim legal protection procedure, only a summary examination is possible; a statement once made cannot be reversed. The distinction between anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli is certainly a balancing act that cannot be described in detail here.” There is no broad ban on pro-Palestinian protests either, and they were even allowed to happen on Oct. 7 of this year (in some cases). While there are legal disputes on specifics for both, I’m pretty confident that no reasonable person would disagree with “broadly permitted” regarding both claims. FortunateSons (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Bonus: there can be cases where something isn’t criminal, but can be restricted in other ways, for example due to different burdens of proof or social pressures. FortunateSons (talk) 17:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

I've removed #2. But there does seem to be evidence that pro-Palestine protests have been banned in parts of Germany at times.[5][6][7].VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 14:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. Maybe the following article gives a bit more clarity.[[8]] Gilbert04 (talk) 18:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Unfortunately that source seems incomplete. Germany has indeed suppressed peaceful criticism of Israel.[9] And Washington Post says "A planned photo exhibit in southwestern Germany was canceled as a result of social media posts by its curator, including one describing “genocide” in Gaza."[10] VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 22:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

Well, I do not think that any source will ever be complete. Let me add two more.[[11]][[12]] Gilbert04 (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

Makes sense. Can an admin please check this out!!! Avishai11 (talk) 19:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

This appears to have been dealt with? Selfstudier (talk) 16:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

• Gaza genocide (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Consider changing "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations, and accused the court of being antisemitic, which it often does when criticised" to "The Israeli government has been accused of consistently weaponizing antisemitism against it's critics, including in the ICJ ruling." Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

The Weaponization of antisemitism page hyperlinked over "often done" has many sources to draw from regarding the accusations' consistency and nature.

My main concern with the original text is that it's voiced as if it's an observation made by a Wikipedian. The benefit here is that the weaponization of antisemitism has a clearer consistency grounded outside of Wikipedia. Perhaps other ways to word this out include adding a time scale (increasingly accused since Oct. 7th) or specifying the critique (against critiques of their actions since Oct 7th).

If a lead paragraph change is necessary, there may be reason to outline Israeli motives and conditions for the genocide, including Zionism and anti-Arab racism. Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:25, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

@Ecco2kstan, how about: "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations. Supporters of Israel say that accusing Israel of genocide is both antisemitic[13][14] and a form of Holocaust erasure[15], but others argue antisemitism shouldn't be exploited to shield Israel from such allegations.[16][17][18][19]".VR _{(Please ping on reply)} 00:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

I'm not as familiar with the Holocaust erasure claims, but I'm happy with that reworking! If that weaponization of Holocaust denial detail isn't on the weaponization of antisemitism page already, it might be a worthwhile phenomenon incorporate if there's more citations you can find. I might look into it myself. Thanks! Ecco2kstan (talk) 03:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

That does sound quite balanced. +1 from me. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 18:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)

@Vice regent: Would you please make this change, so we can close this request? ~Anachronist (talk) 21:28, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

The text I originally wanted modified was changed to "Israel's supporters say that accusing Israel of genocide is antisemitic, but others argue antisemitism should not be exploited to shield Israel from such allegations" after other discussions on the talk page. I almost like it better, but by saying "Israel's supporters" it relieves some of the responsibility from the Israeli government in the accusations that was, to an extent, duly credited in the original modification. Maybe now, it should just say "The Israeli government and their supporters say that accusing the state for genocide antisemitic..." or something similar. Ecco2kstan (talk) 17:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

This one, too? Selfstudier (talk) 16:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

• Gaza genocide (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The 70% figure in both the primary and the secondary source refers to the deaths that were verified by the UN Human Rights Office, not the totality of deaths in Gaza.

Accordingly, the current phrasing "70% of Palestinian deaths in Gaza are women and children" is inaccurate and should be changed to "70% of the 8,119 verified deaths were women and children" Zlmark (talk) 06:10, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

@Zlmark I agree with this - Wikipedia needs to be accurate and reliable. Things like this are pushing millions of people away from Wikipedia, when we want to do the opposite. We want this to change. Becoming more accurate is key. Hopefully this happens. Avishai @Avishai11 Avishai11 (talk) 20:07, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

No doubt about it. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:30, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Nothing needs to be done here, the article is clear enough.Selfstudier (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

• List of highest-grossing Indian films (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

in the content, higehst grossing franchises, rank 4 (Cop Universe), in that one, the movie Singham Returns (2014) is highlighted in green which indicates it is a recent movie, but actually the movie Singham Again (2024) should be highlighted in green because unlike Singham Returns, it is a recent movie, it has wrongly been marked, kindly correct it. Thanks :) Zev the Editor (talk) 16:21, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Source? Avishai11 (talk) 19:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

• Two-state solution (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I would like to request the addition of the following paragraph on Singapore’s support for a two-state solution under the section "International Positions on the Two-State Solution" in the Two-state solution article:

International Positions on the Two-State Solution

Singapore: Singapore supports a two-state solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocating for a negotiated outcome aligned with relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions. According to Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Singapore believes this approach allows Israelis and Palestinians to coexist peacefully and securely, considering it the only viable path toward a comprehensive, just, and lasting resolution. Singapore also consistently upholds the Palestinian right to a homeland. The PLO, which constitutes the key pillar of the current Palestinian Authority, accepts Israel's right to exist and has renounced terrorism.^[1]

EsenL (talk) 02:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

I support this. It makes sense, has quotations and everything. If only an admin would answer... @Avishai11 Avishai11 (talk) 19:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Source? Providing a source to back up your edit drastically improves the chance it'll be done. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 02:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

have added! thanks! EsenL (talk) 02:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

• Gaza genocide (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In the "Indirect" section, the following sentence should be added after "186,000 or even more deaths could be attributable to the current conflict in Gaza":

Three days after the publication, one of the writers, Professor Martin McKee, clarified that the 186,000 figure was “purely illustrative”^[1] and stated that “our piece has been greatly misquoted and misinterpreted.”^[2]

Zlmark (talk) 16:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

• Springfield pet-eating hoax (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I would like to request that a change be made for accuracy under the subhead Origin and spread: Other events. There is a reference to a photo of a man carrying two dead geese, but it is actually only one goose. Footnotes 54, 58, and 59 all state that there is one goose in the photo. Footnote 60 says two geese, but this is evidently a mistake on TMZ's part as the photo itself clearly shows only one goose.

I suggest that the wording "man carrying two dead Canada geese" be changed to "man carrying a dead Canada goose".

In the next sentence I suggest that the wording "The geese were roadkill" either be changed to "The goose was roadkill" or that this part of the sentence be eliminated since the only source for the goose being roadkill is the TMZ article which may be unreliable and perhaps should be removed as a reference? It's possible the official quoted by TMZ was referring to a different incident altogether involving two roadkill geese and TMZ mistakenly linked this to the Columbus photo.

Then I suggest in the following sentence the wording "stealing geese" be changed to "stealing a goose".

Also, I would like to suggest that the semi-protected status be lifted from the Talk page of this article. 2600:100A:B10A:4AA1:0:21:7E13:E301 (talk) 23:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

The talk-page protection cannot be reversed here; either contact El C or appeal at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement to get it lifted. (I will note, however, that the semi-protection is set to lift 16 December.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 07:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

• Gaza genocide (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I suggest changing the map on the states agreeing with with the Genocide charge (green coloured) to include Spain and Ireland, as these declared to join South Africa's case in the ICJ and generally agree with the allegations in public statements. Ireland also passed a motion in the parliament declaring it a genocide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:9e8:9a4:6900:50f:51e:c5cd:b7cf (talk • contribs) 15:10, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

• 2024 US presidential election (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

In the state results table, I would like to request that the columns labeled Margin and Margin swing be filled in, for those rows/states in which the relevant data has already been entered. Obviously not every state has data, but most do.

This should be trivial, at least for Margin, but the inability to sort by margin has been annoying me for a week now. LoganStokols (talk) 19:23, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

• Israel–Hamas war (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello,

In this article, the following section is problematic.

"On 9 or 10 October, Hamas offered to release all civilian hostages held in Gaza if Israel would call off its planned invasion of the Gaza Strip, but the Israeli government rejected the offer.[242]"

It needs to be taken out completely.

The original article is based on an interview in Times of Israel newspaper. In the interview, the interviewee mentions this as a side comment:

“We later found out that Hamas had offered on October 9 or 10 to release all the civilian hostages in exchange for the IDF not entering the Strip, but the government rejected the offer.”

There is no mention of how they found out, and this is pretty much the only "evidence" given in support of any offer from Hamas to release all civilian hostages. It is less than hearsay.

Thank you for listening.

Ioana IoanaBlandiana (talk) 16:49, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

• January 6 United States Capitol attack (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Add US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms to Parties list Add US Marshal Service to Parties list Add Arlington County Police to Parties list Add US Park Police to Parties List

Nhryan122 (talk) 05:32, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

• 2024 United States presidential election (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Change 'Trump achieved a decisive victory in the electoral college' to 'Trump won the electoral college.'

I know reliable sources are using the word "decisive," but it feels a little too editorializing for the tone of Wikipedia. 2600:1700:46B0:D50:3074:103:DAF0:F89F (talk) 16:31, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

• Kamala Harris (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The VP section should now have "succeeding - JD Vance (elect) Enochz7 (talk) 21:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

• Joe Biden (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

His 'president' section should have "succeeded by - Donald J Trump (elect) Enochz7 (talk) 02:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

• Example Article Name (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I would like to request that... (Your edit request here) . 213.105.169.79 (talk) 20:31, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

2024 United States Presidential election Kamala Harris’ vote total in Virginia is incorrect by 100,000 extra votes.

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

• Jason Lagos (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I would kindly like to submit a request for autopatrolled rights. I have created 50+ articles since 2017, which you will find listed on my user page here, none of which have been deleted nor have received any new page reviewers' comments in quite some time. I have also improved thousands more articles across Wikipedia. I am mainly interested in increasing the coverage of all things Brussels-related. Thanks in advance! Jason Lagos (talk) 17:42, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

• Royalesignature (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I'm currently planning to host a campaign and will be needing it to make my communication easier, faster and saver as an organiser. Royalesignature (talk). 17:04, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Could you share more details about this campaign? Have you made a request at Wikipedia talk:Mass message senders before? —Ganesha811 (talk) 21:34, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

https://meta.wikimedia.orgview_html.php?sq=Qlik&lang=&q=Wiki_Kwara_Odyssey_Project

And this https://meta.wikimedia.orgview_html.php?sq=Qlik&lang=&q=Exploring_the_Cultural_Heritage_of_Yoruba_Compounds_Wikimedia/Topic_list

Attached is the links to the metapages of those projects and I'm yet to request Wikipedia talk:Mass message senders Royalesignature (talk). 03:31, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

 Not done Thanks for the info, but I think it would be best for this first campaign if you made requests at WT:MMS and got some experience there before gaining the permission yourself. The campaigns look interesting - good luck and happy editing! If all goes smoothly, you could come back here and make another request in a while. —Ganesha811 (talk) 13:45, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

@Royalesignature did you have an update to @Ganesha811's questions? Dr vulpes (Talk) 19:29, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for reaching out I've provided the update just now.

Thanks Royalesignature (talk). 03:33, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) I would like to point out that WT:MMS is rarely backlogged and is happy to accept mass message requests. – DreamRimmer (talk) 03:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

• 2601AC47 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I have a handful of pages on my watchlist with the PC protection (particularly some films and TV series), and I would like to be able to have a go at reviewing IP and newcomer edits to them if I see that they're not by anyone else. Thanks for considering. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 18:39, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 02:32, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Gratefulking (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Alright I’ll make use of this right, thanks Gratefulking (talk) 20:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has 63 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 20:50, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

 Not done. Thank you for volunteering, but I'd like to see some more activity with reverting vandalism prior to granting this permission. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:12, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

• JayCubby (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I've read and understood WP:RPC and will proceed slowly at first (that is, leave what I deem edge cases to someone else). JayCubby Talk 17:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

• Mwwv (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I believe this could help me out with the current vandalism fighting I do that may involve pages with pending changes. I have read WP:RPC, and I have a good understanding of Wikipedia's P&Gs. mwwv ^converse∫_edits 12:55, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Relativity (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I've been patrolling Recent Changes for a long time now and wanted to try something different: Huggle and/or AntiVandal. I haven't been extremely active lately, but my work should be clearing up soon. I've read WP:ROLLBACK and always try to warn editors. Thank you for your consideration. ‍Relativity ⚡️ 22:06, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 23:28, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

• Cremastra (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Requesting rollback to help with my anti-vandalism work. I understand the guidelines and already consistently warn users and use appropriate edit summaries. Cremastra ‹ u — c › 03:01, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done. PhilKnight (talk) 03:49, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! Cremastra ‹ u — c › 13:52, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

• Ow0cast (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Since I started actively contributing to Wikipedia, most of my efforts have been reverting vandalism and RCP. I would like rollback permissions so I can use tools such as Huggle, and remove the need to open diffs in a new tab and manually inspect them. Thank you for considering me. /etc/owuh $ (💬 | she/her) 00:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done Elli (talk | contribs) 02:40, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• Jannatulbaqi (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

Five months ago, I requested rollback rights, but Admin Fastily rejected the request, advising me to spend some time on recentchanges, warn editors when reverting their edits, and gain more experience. I have diligently followed this guidance and now feel that the time is right to submit another request for rollback rights. I am confident in distinguishing between good-faith and bad-faith edits and always ensure to warn editors when necessary. Currently, I am also serving as an AFC reviewer and Pending Changes reviewer. Thank you for considering my request. Baqi:) (talk) 14:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

@Jannatulbaqi I'm not declining, but I'm a bit concerned that you're a bit too quick to use semi-automated tools when reviewing edits. For example, you reverted this edit, when you should've just removed the entire sentence per WP:BLPSOURCE. You also reverted this one, but didn't tag the article with {{current sports transaction}}. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:22, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, respected Ahecht, for noting this. The first edit I reverted was due to a local slur that was highly offensive. Secondly, while reverting, I had asked in the edit summary, "where is the reference?" when I should have used the proper tag on the article. I assure you that such mistakes will not occur in the future. Thank you. Baqi:) (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

@Jannatulbaqi I'll leave it up to another admin to grant or deny the request, but in the future when you revert highly offensive material, you should also request WP:Revision deletion. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 18:55, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you, I will take care of that in future:) Baqi:) (talk) 18:58, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done. I don't really see too many issues with granting rollback—it's just rollback and can be easily revoked if misused. Reaper Eternal (talk) 04:47, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you @Reaper Eternal, I assure you that I will not misuse this permission. Baqi:) (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• SmittenGalaxy (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I've been doing RCP for several months now, and I'd like to request rollback permission so I can more effectively utilize anti-vandal tools to counter vandals and bad-faith edits. I believe I have a good understanding of both reverting as well as rollback, and what typically counts as vandalism, disruption, and general bad edits. SmittenGalaxy | talk! 01:55, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

• PEPSI697 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te)}

I would like to have the Rollback rights permission if I could. I have been patrolling RC since 8 August 2024 and have mostly consistently warned or notified users for their edit or vandalism by using the tool Twinkle. I often stumble upon lots of vandalism and think this feature would help. I understand that the Rollback feature is only used for reverting vandalism. I initially requested for this permission on 30 September 2024 but was denied. Thanks. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 08:19, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

 Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined in the past 90 days ([20]). — MusikBot ^talk 08:20, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

@PEPSI697 Any idea what happened here? You gave a 4im warning after a level 4 warning was already given, and that IP address had never edited the "Chabad" article. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:52, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, wrong article was provided. I normally copy and paste the article name when consistently warning users so I don't forget. Probably because I've warned another IP user for another edit on that article. It was a mistake, that's all. Thanks for telling me. PEPSI697 (💬 • 📝) 20:49, 26 November 2024 (UTC)